on โ06-05-2014 02:48 AM
I was thoroughly disgusted by the appalling lack of manners displayed by the demonstrators in the studio audience last night and I was extremely gratified to see that following a short unscheduled musical interlude, they had been unceremoniously ejected from the studio. Not the best way to try to get their point across, and they did far more harm to their cause than good IMO. ๐
on โ06-05-2014 10:10 AM
They do have a right to protest, peacefully.
But we also have a right to assess merit in light of conduct. Now, I am very happy to politely debate any topic of any ones choosing, but only on the proviso that they conduct themselves with due decorum. Now, none of these protesters displayed decorum in any form, and therefore, in my book, irrespective of the validity (or otherwise) of the augment, they have earned the label, feral.
Furthermore, nowhere in my post did I assert bias toward any political group or leaning. That is I didnโt attack Q and A on its obvious biased towards either the left or the right,and Iโm happy to see you agree bias exists. Therefore I assume you agree that this bias is inappropriate and should cease, and if it doesnโt, corrective action is required.
on โ06-05-2014 10:25 AM
it isn't so much the protest itself , its the fact that it exists at all that's encouraging. wrong place ? wrong approach ? most likely yes. wrong motivation ? heck no.
as for the ABC bias claims, i would say that the other networks do not provide a similar set of programs. we have a bit of predictable comment inserted into the commercial networks magazine format 'news programs' and that's it apart from the terribly compromised Bolt and his LNP advertorial, hardly a serious effort. the ABC SBS are the only ones doing anything real in this area .. they fill a very large hole.. and i would suggest to those who consider them 'biased' that in fact they report it as close to the truth as possible whereas the others make no effort apart from paid propaganda.
on โ06-05-2014 10:33 AM
@nero_wulf wrote:How did so many socialist radicals get into the Q&A audience? What is the vetting like? How often does this happen, when weโre told the audience is balanced but discover from the hooting itโs just another love-in of the Left?
Probably the same way "black ops" did last week, they are not truthful when completing the aplication form.
Who would be surprised if it turns out these were more black ops in disguise?
on โ06-05-2014 10:41 AM
on โ06-05-2014 10:48 AM
It looked less like a protest to me, more like a tantrum by a group juveniles about to have their gravy train derailed.
on โ06-05-2014 10:49 AM
The protesters celebrating They include both the two questioners whoโd identified as Socialist Alternative members. The picture was posted by Omar Hassan, a Socialist Alternative leader and another member of the Q&A audience.
Seems the Education Action Group is just another Marxist front.
[Marxism] Why I am joining Socialist Alternative in Australia (Omar Hassan)
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism/2012-September/143719.html
on โ06-05-2014 10:56 AM
its hard to see how a group that is open as to who they are can be ''A Front '' they are who they say they are, hardly a front.
''A Front'' better describes the LNP who describe themselves as representatives of constituents but are in fact a proven 'front' for the big end of town .
on โ06-05-2014 10:58 AM
on โ06-05-2014 11:33 AM
I no longer watch this appalling radical left wing show masquerading as a "balanced" debate.
Jones is a far left wing socialist and I wonder why any Conservative would give this program the time of day.
on โ06-05-2014 11:35 AM
Yes, they were disruptive, but good on them for using their voice and passion to take a stand against something that will not only affect themselves but also those who want to further their eduction in the future. I dread the upcoming budget and if it does turn out to be as unneccesarily harsh as expected then the government should expect further protest from all sectors of the community..