on 30-01-2014 11:29 AM
MORE than 1000 failed asylum seekers who have had their claims rejected but are still in Australia have been put on notice, with the Abbott government threatening to put them into detention and deport them if they refuse to return home voluntarily.
Immigration Minister Scott Morrison last night said the people in community detention or in detention centres had failed in their claims - some multiple times including judicial reviews - and had no right to be in Australia any more.
More than 30,000 asylum seekers are living on the Australian mainland after the masses of boat arrivals under the previous Labor government - residing in community detention and receiving welfare benefits paid for by taxpayers or in detention centres at a cost to taxpayers.
Mr Morrison said more than 1000 of these people had been "sitting in the network and in the community after having their claims rejected".
"The government will take the steps necessary to remove failed asylum seekers from Australia who wish to stay indefinitely at taxpayers' expense," he said.
"Once you have had your asylum claims assessed and rejected not just by the department but also on appeal, it's time to go home, as you have been assessed as not being owed protection.
...assessed as not being owed protection...I wonder what they were assesed as?
The name of that boat has got to be photoshopped hasn't it?
on 30-01-2014 12:09 PM
@crikey*mate wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@crikey*mate wrote:I was under the impression that if an application wasn't successful then they were supposed to be deported.
According to the article they are giving them fair notice to make arrangements of their own. Those that can't be deported due to" diplomatic or legal reasons but the government would not be deterred and put the failed asylum seekers in detention."
what's the alternative?
I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm just trying to understand.
They applied, the answer was "no", some after appeals and enquiries.
If we're just going to let them stay anyway, why the need to apply in the first place?
I think if wartime conditions or persecution still apply in the country of origin it would be illegal to deport them back. In that case, if those whose applications were rejected were living in the community on welfare, they would be put in detention.
on 30-01-2014 12:10 PM
@boris1gary wrote:well Icy at least you find it funny.
find what funny?
on 30-01-2014 12:26 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@boris1gary wrote:"Rejects To Be Deported"
What a shameful way to describe fellow humans.
Maybe you could take news.com to task about the quality of their headlines, boris, lol.
lol, icy lol
on 30-01-2014 12:34 PM
@boris1gary wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@boris1gary wrote:"Rejects To Be Deported"
What a shameful way to describe fellow humans.
Maybe you could take news.com to task about the quality of their headlines, boris, lol.
lol, icy lol
you find it funny?
on 30-01-2014 12:41 PM
The name of that boat has got to be photoshopped hasn't it?
apparently not
http://www.theage.com.au/national/first-asylum-boat-for-new-year-20140101-3067e.html
on 30-01-2014 12:50 PM
@**meep** wrote:
The name of that boat has got to be photoshopped hasn't it?
apparently not
http://www.theage.com.au/national/first-asylum-boat-for-new-year-20140101-3067e.html
on 30-01-2014 12:55 PM
“The boats have not yet stopped but they are stopping,” Mr Morrison said in the statement.
on 30-01-2014 01:19 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@boris1gary wrote:"Rejects To Be Deported"
What a shameful way to describe fellow humans.
Maybe you could take news.com to task about the quality of their headlines, boris, lol.
I think we all should. It's quite sickening.
on 30-01-2014 01:48 PM
Just looked up the report again, IT NOW HAS A DIFFERENT HEADING.
DEB
on 30-01-2014 02:49 PM
If their applicaions have been rejected, it means that they are NOT genuine candidates for Refugee status, and as such SHOULD BE DEPORTED.