Rolf Harris - Assault Charges.

[electric*mayhem*band]

Rolf Harris appeared at London's Southark Crown Court  yesterday (Tues), to answer assault charges.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2621242/Rolf-Harris-84-arrives-crown-court-supported-wife-fa...

Freddie Starr meanwhile, has been cleared of all charges due to lack of evidence.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/474302/Freddie-Starr-cleared-over-sex-abuse-claims

[polksaladallie]

It is becoming clear that the incidents we have already been informed about were just the "tip of the iceberg".  No-one will ever know the extent of his abuse. There will be many women who will not speak out.   He is no different from Savile, in that he used his position and his renown as a cover. 

[durruticolumna]

The Australian is a tabloid broadsheet owned by Rupert Murdoch,e*m*b. Ergo it's not a newspaper but a pro Tory propaganda rag.

[azureline**]

Old thread bump alert

It would appear that duffy is psychic.

Cliff Richard is being tnvestigated 😞

[freddie*rooster]

Yes, hmmmm Duffy what are the lotto numbers for next week?

[polksaladallie]

My opinion is that it is probably not in the same category as Harris's behaviour, but the "chicken tonight" was a bit too young.

[bluecat*dancing]

A boy under the age of 16 is what I've read.

[azureline**]

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

My opinion is that it is probably not in the same category as Harris's behaviour, but the "chicken tonight" was a bit too young.

---

what does that mean?

[bella_again]

The discussion about Cliff Richards has been around for a while.  Let's remember though an allegation does not mean any one is guilty of anything at this stage.  We won't know until the police have concluded their investigation into the matter.

There was an article on ABC news about it apparently as blue cat says a boy under 16 and in the 80's don't quote me on that though its a vague recollection!!! lol

Hopefully the truth of the matter comes out soon.

[azureline**]

I am  not believing it ............ sad if it is correct though.

[polksaladallie]

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

My opinion is that it is probably not in the same category as Harris's behaviour, but the "chicken tonight" was a bit too young.

---

what does that mean?

---

That means that he might be in the category of those who prefer teenaged boys, 16, 17, 18,19 etc.  Perhaps this one was too young without his knowledge.  (That's no excuse, though), 

The "chicken tonight" action is a communication is bars etc.