on 29-06-2013 05:01 PM
This is a good thing.....right?
Particularly with an election in the near future
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324328204578572972575811406.html?mod=e2tw
on 29-06-2013 05:26 PM
Rudd on global warming "Global warming is the greatest moral challenge of our time" then ditched this greatest moral challenge at the behest of Gillard. A real conviction politician right? wrong.
He has no convictions, no new policy, no moral fibre, just a revenge filled narcissist bent on power. All he's good for is wedge politics & power.
on 29-06-2013 05:34 PM
on 29-06-2013 05:35 PM
No Donna it does not affect me directly, but it affects the whole population indirectly.
For the people it does affect there is nothing stopping then forming a relationship in anyway they choose.
Marriage was born out a need to protect the offspring of a union, In a homosexual relationship there can be no offspring, regardless how often they couple, that need the protection of marriage.
Other legal matters are already covered as far as property is concerned.
I can not see any logical reason for homosexuals to get married to each other.
That is why I asked yuou to build a convincing case 🙂
on 29-06-2013 05:39 PM
on 29-06-2013 05:59 PM
OMG I love my cat but I don't want to marry it
Now convince why people who love each other feel the need to get married? what advantage does it have?
Does a certificate increase the level of love?
on 29-06-2013 06:03 PM
on 29-06-2013 06:06 PM
Do you think it should be an election issue?
on 29-06-2013 06:10 PM
on 29-06-2013 06:16 PM
So Donna do you put it on the sale level as hospitals, homelessness, roads, child abuse, discrimination, law and order, criminality, drugs, taxation, transport, and the list goes on.
on 29-06-2013 06:19 PM
*same*