Russian Troops in Syria

Russian troops join combat in Syria: sources

 

Russia says the Syrian government must be incorporated into a shared global fight against Islamic State. The US and Assad's regional foes see him as part of the problem.

 

 

The US officials, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said the intent of Russia's military moves in Syria was unclear. One suggested the focus may be on preparing an airfield near the port city of Latakia, a stronghold of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

 "We would welcome constructive Russian contributions to the counter-IS effort, but we've been clear that it would be unconscionable for any party, including the Russians, to provide any support to the Assad regime," White House spokesman Eric Schultz said.

 

Assad's forces have faced big setbacks on the battlefield in a four-year-old multi-sided civil war that has killed 250,000 people and driven half of Syria's 23 million people from their homes.

 

Syrian troops pulled out of a major air base last Wednesday, and a monitoring group said this meant there were no government soldiers in Idlib province, most of which slipped from government control earlier this year.

 

Moscow confirmed it had "experts" on the ground in Syria, its long-time ally in the Middle East.

 

Russia says the Syrian government must be incorporated into a shared global fight against Islamic State. The US and Assad's regional foes see him as part of the problem.

 

"We would welcome constructive Russian contributions to the counter-IS effort, but we've been clear that it would be unconscionable for any party, including the Russians, to provide any support to the Assad regime," White House spokesman Eric Schultz said.

 

Assad's forces have faced big setbacks on the battlefield in a four-year-old multi-sided civil war that has killed 250,000 people and driven half of Syria's 23 million people from their homes.

 

Syrian troops pulled out of a major air base last Wednesday, and a monitoring group said this meant there were no government soldiers in Idlib province, most of which slipped from government control earlier this year.

 

Moscow confirmed it had "experts" on the ground in Syria, its long-time ally in the Middle East.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/russian-troops-join-combat-in-syria-sources-20150909-gjj4k6.html#ixzz3lJ...

 
Hmmm...I think the Russians would be there to support the Syrian government. But is would help if they joined forces in battling ISIL
Message 1 of 16
Latest reply
15 REPLIES 15

Russian Troops in Syria

Oh and closer to home there was North and South Vietnam.
Message 11 of 16
Latest reply

Russian Troops in Syria


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Oh and closer to home there was North and South Vietnam.

And we might want to ask ourselves whether beheading people is worse than droping napalm on them

Message 12 of 16
Latest reply

Russian Troops in Syria

or nuclear bombs

Message 13 of 16
Latest reply

Russian Troops in Syria

The Syria conflict is not about oil as I have heard suggested here in the capital, its about arms.

 

the supply of arms weapons to Syria and other nations by russia is a huge industry, huge..

 

 

Message 14 of 16
Latest reply

Russian Troops in Syria


@fiestas*girl wrote:

The Syria conflict is not about oil as I have heard suggested here in the capital, its about arms.

 

the supply of arms weapons to Syria and other nations by russia is a huge industry, huge..

 

 


Oh yes indeed. For Britain and the US as well.

 

Message 15 of 16
Latest reply

Russian Troops in Syria


@icyfroth wrote:

@fiestas*girl wrote:

The Syria conflict is not about oil as I have heard suggested here in the capital, its about arms.

 

the supply of arms weapons to Syria and other nations by russia is a huge industry, huge..

 

 


Oh yes indeed. For Britain and the US as well.

 

Dealing in death: the secrets of Britain’s arms trade

 

Michael Hodges:

My own investigations into the weapons business have been concerned with the worldwide proliferation of small arms, but the UK mainly flogs big-ticket stuff: fighter bombers, tanks and radar systems.

 

Many of these, unlike AK-47s, remain unused and it can be argued that the real damage they do is in their commission and sale. Take South Africa where, Gilby suggests, the money siphoned from the national budget and into corrupt arms deals was directly responsible for the death of thousands.

 

In 1999, South Africa signed up for defence contracts costing $5bn; at the same time, President Thabo Mbeki said that the country couldn’t afford to extend antiretroviral medication to five million HIV-infected citizens. Between 2000 and 2005, according to Harvard University research cited by Gilby, 330,000 South Africans died because they could not afford treatment for HIV or Aids.

 

Few, though, can compare for entertainment value with Sir Shapoor Reporter, a conduit in the 1970s for British payments (through a front company) to secure a deal to equip the Iranian army with Chieftain tanks.

 

Negotiations were carried out in an atmosphere of secrecy and intrigue, much of which was attributable to the eccentricity of the shah but also because Reporter was working for both the UK and Tehran.

An Iranian with British citizenship, he taught the shah’s second wife to speak English and was regarded as onside by Brits – mainly because he was an SIS agent. He was also on a large commission.

 

An American politician emerges as one of the few heroes in this book. Within a year of coming to office in 1977, President Jimmy Carter pushed through the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. This was as much a practical measure as a product of the Georgia Baptist’s moral character. As a Congress report put it: “Improper payments . . . lend credence to the suspicions sown by foreign opponents of the United States that American enterprises exert a corrupting influence on the political processes of their nations.”

 

Entire Article Here

 

 

Message 16 of 16
Latest reply