on 13-11-2014 11:03 AM
Say-nothing Bill Shorten doesn’t have the guts to stand up to Putin
CALL him Bill Shhh-orten. The Labor leader yesterday revealed his unusual method for dealing with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the flight MH17 atrocity, which killed 38 Australians.
Mr Shorten’s gambit?
Absolute silence.
Asked at a Melbourne press conference what he would say to Mr Putin if he encountered the Russian leader at this weekend’s G20 summit in Brisbane, Mr Shorten replied: “Nothing.”
According to Mr Shorten, there is little point speaking to the Russian President.
Putin has massive popular support in his own country. He, I don’t think, frankly, cares about what Australia thinks,” Mr Shorten said.
A reporter then asked: “Just to clarify, you wouldn’t seek to talk to Mr Putin?”
“Not in the first instance,” Mr Shorten answered.
The Opposition Leader has previously supported the government’s strong stand over the MH17 disaster, even to the point of suggesting Mr Putin be banned from the G20 meeting.
“The seeking of justice, as the Prime Minister has indicated, cannot be shirked. So let me be very clear, I have the gravest reservations about welcoming to Australia anyone in the future who’s engaged in this act of terror,’’ Mr Shorten told parliament in August.
Mr Shorten’s vow of silence follows a meeting between Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Mr Putin during the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation leaders’ summit in Beijing, where Mr Abbott told the Russian President that “MH17 was destroyed by a missile from a launcher that had come out of Russia, was fired from inside eastern Ukraine and then returned to Russia”.
According to a spokeswoman for the Prime Minister, Mr Abbott told Mr Putin Russia should follow the example set when the US paid compensation after it accidentally shot down an Iranian civilian aircraft in 1988.
“The Prime Minister observed that when the United States had inadvertently shot down a civilian aircraft it had duly apologised and made appropriate restitution,” Mr Abbott’s spokeswoman said.
“He commended the precedent to President Putin.”
In Canberra a Russian official rejected any allegation of responsibility for the MH17 crash: “If the Prime Minister has any clear evidence he should bring it to the table. We haven’t seen it.”
on 13-11-2014 11:04 AM
on 13-11-2014 11:08 AM
why would he be expected to say anything??
on 13-11-2014 11:16 AM
Bill doesn't need to say anything Tone can put his foot in it all by himself.
on 13-11-2014 11:29 AM
@debra9275 wrote:why would he be expected to say anything??
Because he wants to be the next PM?
on 13-11-2014 11:33 AM
but he's only the opposition leader currently, so why would he be expected to say anything?
on 13-11-2014 11:55 AM
@debra9275 wrote:but he's only the opposition leader currently, so why would he be expected to say anything?
The daily Telegraph and the OP would be putting the **bleep**pers on Shorten what ever he said.
The point is not about what Shorten will or will not say and all about attacking Shorten for anything and everything for the sake of attack.
on 13-11-2014 11:55 AM
13-11-2014 11:56 AM - edited 13-11-2014 11:56 AM
Shorten has said plenty about one of the most important issues at G20.
Opposition leader Bill Shorten has taken his battle with prime minister Tony Abbott over climate policy to an international stage, saying the issue should be a priority for the G20 leaders' meeting in Brisbane
http://theconversation.com/shorten-urges-climate-issues-be-a-priority-at-g20-29642
This address was in July, but he has repeated his concerns today because other countries have brought it to the fore at APEC.
The APEC Summit Closes With a 'Historic' Climate Deal Between the US and China
on 13-11-2014 11:56 AM
@gleee58 wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:but he's only the opposition leader currently, so why would he be expected to say anything?
The daily Telegraph and the OP would be putting the **bleep**pers on Shorten what ever he said.
The point is not about what Shorten will or will not say and all about attacking Shorten for anything and everything for the sake of attack.
The question is why are they trying to hold the Opposition leader to account and ignoring the or licking the backside of the useless government.