on 27-11-2013 09:38 PM
Almost 10 million migrants over the next 50 years will swell Australia's population to more than 40 million by 2060 and more than 50 million by 2100, under dramatically higher new projections by the Bureau of Statistics.
The projections, the first for five years, envisage tens of millions more people crowding into Australia's capital cities over the next 50 years, overwhelmingly due to migration.
By 2060, the bureau estimates, Melbourne will have 8.5 million people, twice as many as now. Even by 2050, it would have 1.2 million more people than the state government assumed in its core planning strategy, Plan Melbourne, released last month.
By then Sydney would have 8.4 million, an increase of 80 per cent from now.
Perth would more than double to 5.5 million people, and Brisbane to 4.8 million. Both cities would be bigger than Sydney is now.
Melbourne would overtake Sydney in 2053.
Those four cities, the migrant magnets of Australia, would add 14 million of the 18.4 million extra people envisaged by 2060.
The rest of Queensland would add 2 million, the ACT would double to almost 750,000, but in much of the rest of Australia - South Australia, Tasmania, and regional NSW and Victoria - population growth will either reverse or slow to minimal levels by 2050.
Migration would become the driving source of Australia's growth. The bureau's central projection assumes a long-run average net gain of 240,000 migrants a year, roughly current levels.
That already generates 60 per cent of Australia's population growth, but that would rise to two-thirds over the forecast period as the society ages.
Click Here To View Full Article
8.4 Mil for Sydney? And I thought the traffic was bad now!
on 28-11-2013 12:18 AM
Nice piece of street theatre anyway. 🙂
on 28-11-2013 09:21 AM
World news reported last week that 70% of population growth will be attributable to muslims
Twenty years ago approx., the Aussie government conducted a lengthy study and concluded that the maximum population able to be sustained here was 13 million
With resouces stretched way beyond limits, expect to pay more for water than for printing-ink, not to mention a premium placed on 'clean air' locations (which will probably mean some areas, for the very wealthy, will be spared too intensive Chemtrails, compared with those struggling to breathe elsewhere)
But hey, by then CEOs will be reaping in something like $20 million per month or something. Age and other pensions will only exist in history books, along with many other things we currently take for granted
Corporate-owned governments with the privileged living in subterranean bubbles or undersea
A Mad Max world I'll be free of, along with our children who've chosen to be child-free. We'll be leaving no-one behind. And I pity the cold-caller who tries to sell us reincarnation
on 28-11-2013 09:13 PM
A projection.....meaning an educated guess.
THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING...CLUCK....CLUCK...CLUCK
Someone will have to look after you all when you cannot afford a pension in your 70's.
on 28-11-2013 09:41 PM
on 28-11-2013 10:14 PM
@spotweldersfriend wrote:
Can't afford Gonski.Can't afford to raise super contributions.Can't affort NDIS.What a progressive party we have in power.
Never mind shush shush go back to sleep. By 2060 all that will have passed out of living memory.
on 28-11-2013 10:20 PM
@topsidesoul wrote:A projection.....meaning an educated guess.
Yes, an EDUCATED guess.
THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING...CLUCK....CLUCK...CLUCK
Don't you mean squawk squawk squawk?
I believe chooks tend to cluck when they're contented.
Someone will have to look after you all when you cannot afford a pension in your 70's.
As throughout the ages, children will look after their parents.
on 28-11-2013 10:31 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@topsidesoul wrote:A projection.....meaning an educated guess.
Yes, an EDUCATED guess.
THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING...CLUCK....CLUCK...CLUCK
Don't you mean squawk squawk squawk?
I believe chooks tend to cluck when they're contented.
Someone will have to look after you all when you cannot afford a pension in your 70's.
As throughout the ages, children will look after their parents.
Looking after your parents is not a big thing in Australia.
As opposed to some south Americans and the japanese.
on 28-11-2013 11:00 PM
People in Australia who have worked and paid their taxes all their lives have had an expectation that when they reach 65 yrs, there is a govt-funded aged pension available to them if they need it when they retire.
They have incorporated this expectation into their retirement plans having often worked for a wage which does not allow for the saving of very much money to see them through their last few years of life.
To have that hope and expectation of a social security safety net suddenly dashed (as this present govt wants to do) is understandably distressing.
It is cruel and unusual to try to do this. And especially so without giving people enough time to plan for this change of circumstance.
Cruel, tricky and mean. The face of Conservative Party philosophy. Take from those who have not, and give to those who already have.
on 28-11-2013 11:09 PM
Become a minister, from any party and get yourself a full funded pension.
That's how winners retire!
on 29-11-2013 12:13 AM