on 04-03-2014 11:08 AM
Many at the ABC see nothing wrong in reporting unfounded allegations of brutality by naval personnel towards asylum-seekers. If it wasn’t true, it is the kind of thing that ought to be true.
Many of us are sickened as we watch the ABC run its own left agenda to the detriment of the rest of the viewers who don't hold that side of politics in any regard.
The ABC will continue on this bent because Turnbull is of the left, wanted to join the Labor party but was rebuffed, so having no inner core beliefs he gravitated towards Conservative politics but his heart isn't in it. This man is a true apparatchik of power just like Rudd.
PETER Coleman once wrote about bohemians who met at Sherry’s coffee shop in wartime Sydney to consider “more important things” than the war.
Nowadays the bohemians are organising the Opposition Leader’s diary and have decided that there were more pressing matters to attend to than welcoming home our troops in Darwin after their longest ever war.
Fortunately Seven Network’s Mark Riley persuaded Bill Shorten to change his mind. Riley’s no-show Bill story aired on Friday’s 6pm news. By 6.30pm the bohemians had managed to find a flight.
Three hours later Shorten was wedged in an economy seat adopting the conventional Jetstar position; his knees pushed firmly against his chin.
Wittingly or unwittingly, Stephen Conroy’s attack on the integrity of a three-star general and Shorten’s diary omission have taken Labor into dangerous territory. The party may be falling out of step, not just with the military, but popular sentiment.
When Labor split over conscription during World War I, prime minister Billy Hughes knew better than to succumb to the “Wobblies”, the Left-wing radicals inspired by the anti-war Industrial Workers of the World.
The Wobblies preferred the “whiff of anarchist bomb plots and folksy songs” to “winning votes and civilising capitalism”, writes Tony Moore in Dancing With Empty Pockets. Hughes took the decisive step of declaring the Wobblies illegal.
on 04-03-2014 05:46 PM
@silverfaun wrote:So, not a single original thought or post? aping my words and style to make comment? lame but that doesnt surprise me on here.
face it, from the perspective of someone like yourself any dissent is left wing bias. don't think like sf ? must me a luvvie leftie.
on 04-03-2014 05:47 PM
@silverfaun wrote:
@boris1gary wrote:
@silverfaun wrote:If posters are unable or unwilling to access all material referencing politics then maybe they have not got a full grasp of the subject and would be better off not commenting on political threads.
Only reading ones preferred side of a debate defeats any educated comment.
and yet everything else is "yellow press" or "left wing bias", isn't the above just slightly hypocritical.
No it isnt but name calling seems to be your answer to everything. Interpersonal much?
did not call you anything, referring to post not poster.
04-03-2014 06:06 PM - edited 04-03-2014 06:07 PM
You are referring to what I write as hypocritical which is name calling and interpersonal.
on 04-03-2014 06:16 PM
@silverfaun wrote:You are referring to what I write as hypocritical which is name calling and interpersonal.
no it is not interpersonal at all, just pointing out that the post could appear to be a little hypocritical after all the claims of "yellow press" and "left wing bias" whenever anything is posted from The Guardian (either one) or any other publication - can't remember some of the other terms - online left boutique or something - never heard it before and can't be bothered to go and look again.
on 04-03-2014 06:21 PM
silverf, I did bother, didn't want to seem rude but below is your answer to a thread I started this morning -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guardian, a left wing propaganda rag only fit for online and boutique left groupthink.
This yellow press can't be taken seriously but the darlings of the left revere it because it gives them what they need.
The majority of Australians know just what line this putrid little rag is running and don't go near it but it seems the reference of choice for many on here.
on 04-03-2014 06:37 PM
Your minute attention to evertyhing I post and going to the trouble to laugh and scoff at a typo makes it interpersonal and hostile.
on 04-03-2014 06:49 PM
whatever then.
on 04-03-2014 06:53 PM
wasn't that me??? re: the OP??
I'm not sure as i haven't read the whole thread
it wasn'tr interpersonal; it was funny because i didn't know what the thread was about & I didn't know it was a typo till I read a couple of posts
on 04-03-2014 07:10 PM
Unless you want to go to other threads copy there then copy and paste it on here to try to squirm out of comments made then no, its not about you.
on 04-03-2014 07:30 PM
@debra9275 wrote:wasn't that me??? re: the OP??
I'm not sure as i haven't read the whole thread
it wasn'tr interpersonal; it was funny because i didn't know what the thread was about & I didn't know it was a typo till I read a couple of posts
sigh