on 07-03-2014 11:59 AM
AUSTRALIA’S lengthy roll-call of recently removed prime ministers is causing unprecedented diplomatic congestion at our biggest embassies.
All are travelling widely and all seek VIP attention from diplomats when they land.
On arrival overseas the ex-PMs can expect assistance in transport and in making appointments with senior officials of the host nation — as they are entitled to do.
The problem comes when they arrive at the same city at roughly the same time and limited resources have to be spread around to accommodate them. Drastic measures are being considered to handle these VIP traffic jams.
Over the past seven years three Prime Ministers have been removed from office by the electorate or by their own party — John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard.
All three now have active private careers which often take them overseas where they seek the help of embassies. A frequent destination is Washington and recently all three were in the city at the same time, straining the hospitality of our diplomats.
• Airport pick-ups and special customs clearance to avoid long queues at airports, all arranged by the local embassy;
• At home, an office and two staff at a maximum cost of $300,000 a year plus payment of all home and mobile telephone bills;
• Lifetime gold passes for domestic and international travel and access to limousine services in Australia.
There have been seven prime ministers leave office since Bob Hawke was replaced by Paul Keating in 1991, and eight since Malcolm Fraser departed in 1983. Three in the past seven years is a remarkable grouping.
There could be some cost cutting there, you'd think...
on 07-03-2014 12:18 PM
you'd think
on 07-03-2014 12:25 PM
tone would prefer things remain as they are for when he joins them.
on 07-03-2014 12:27 PM
pay should be increase while they are in Parliament.......that might attract some people of calibre.
post office perks should be scaled right back
on 07-03-2014 12:40 PM
MILLION DOLLAR PMS
KEVIN RUDD $200,000 pension plus estimated $300,000-a-year office and travel costs
JULIA GILLARD $200,000 pension plus estimated $300,000-a-year office and travel costs
JOHN HOWARD $250,000 pension plus $300,000 a year in office and travel costs.
PAUL KEATING $140,000-a-year office, travel, phone costs + pension
BOB HAWKE $130,000-a-year in office, travel, phone costs + pension
MALCOLM FRASER $220,000-a-year office, travel, phone + pension
GOUGH WHITLAM $125,000-a-year office, travel, phone + pension*
Source: Department of Finance documents.
on 07-03-2014 01:24 PM
@*mrgrizz* wrote:pay should be increase while they are in Parliament.......that might attract some people of calibre.
post office perks should be scaled right back
They get free stamps as well ????
(Sorry, couldn't help it.)
But seriously, I don't begrudge them a bit of support once they are ousted from parliament. Regardless of political affiliation, they (usually) have something to contribute on a global or local scale. Hey, maybe they even change their views once the shackles have fallen from their eyes - Malcolm Fraser comes to mind. It's an insecure job, I agree that their pay should be increased while serving, and maybe there is a bit of room for belt-tightening after they get ditched. Monkeys, peanuts, as *mrgrizz* intimated.
on 07-03-2014 01:43 PM
Imo, Rudd and Gillard should count as one and be required to share the largesse
Similarly, Hawke and Keating
and Whitlam and Fraser
on 07-03-2014 01:53 PM
Nothing will ever change-because the only pollies that can make the change-
are next in line to stick their snouts in the trough............Richo.
on 07-03-2014 02:49 PM
Cut off all over 20 years since they were ousted. Its a rort. Whitlam's no longer a public liability, his days of largesse at public expense are over. Fraser is a greedy old man and should be cut off first.
on 07-03-2014 02:57 PM
Latham is quoted as stating (in his book, I believe) that the ONLY pearls of wisdom Whitlam has been eager to share with him are the many and numerous ways to rort the system and live large on the public purse
And as we've seen, those ex-PMs live an extraordinarly long life when supported by the public which not only tolerated and paid them while in office (which has often been for very brief time with no appreciable benefit TO the public) but is forced, compelled to support them until they finally kick the bucket (which they avoid doing and it's to be suspected their longevity is attributable to organs derived from ..... )