on 13-01-2017 05:39 PM
Pauline Hanson slams ‘politically correct’ Australia Day lamb ad
ONE Nation Senator Pauline Hanson has slammed the meat marketing body’s latest Australia Day lamb ad which controversially omits any mention of “Australia Day”.
Meat & Livestock Australia’s annual ad, released earlier this week, has been dubbed the body’s most political yet for focusing on the controversy around Australia Day for indigenous Australians, many of whom have taken to describing January 26 as “Invasion Day”.
The ad opens on a beach, with two indigenous Australians preparing to light up a barbie, before various settlers begin arriving by boat — the First Fleet, the French, the Russians, Chinese, Greeks, Italians — finally ending with a boatload of asylum seekers approaching the shore.
“Hang on. Aren’t we all boat people?” former MasterChef contestant Poh Ling Yeow asks, to cheers from the crowd. Lamb, according to the MLA, is “the most multicultural meat”.
What a bunch of gutless wonders the MLA are. Mulitcultural? Aren't we all supposed to be Australian?
on 13-01-2017 05:56 PM
I'd say the ad is trying for a bit of humour but either they acknowledge Australia Day or they don't. Bit gutless to avoid it, given they have an annual Aust Day ad.
I suppose the bottom line for them though will be whether the ad manages to push up lamb sales.
Lamb is fairly expensive at the moment.
on 13-01-2017 06:00 PM
@springyzone wrote:I'd say the ad is trying for a bit of humour but either they acknowledge Australia Day or they don't. Bit gutless to avoid it, given they have an annual Aust Day ad.
I suppose the bottom line for them though will be whether the ad manages to push up lamb sales.
Lamb is fairly expensive at the moment.
On the other hand, being an Aussie is going cheap!
on 13-01-2017 06:49 PM
The poor dear. Hasn't it dawned on her that this isn't a piece of lovey, dovey, leftist, propaganda it's a commercial- an advertisement put out by the meat marketing body to encourage people to buy their product.
Advertising agencies are not stupid, they make their money by understanding how the general public thinks and what it wants. So if they believe an advert showing an inclusive, welcoming, multicultural Australia is the best way to persuade people to buy lamb chops, then I guess that ad must be a better example of the true Aussie spirit than the rantings of Pauline Hanson.
And that makes me very happy.
on 14-01-2017 07:45 AM
What's next to go?
ANZAC day?
Blue Mountains Anzac Day marches cancelled as anti-terrorism measures drive up costs
Four Anzac Day marches have been cancelled in NSW's Blue Mountains region after the State Government introduced new anti-terrorism requirements, which RSL clubs say would cost them thousands of dollars to comply with.
The RSL sub-branches in Katoomba, Blackheath, Springwood and Glenbrook have cancelled their annual marches, which have been staged for almost 100 years.
Was last year's centenary the really the Last Hurrah?
on 14-01-2017 08:22 AM
Sad that it has come to this Icy .....
on 14-01-2017 10:12 AM
@icyfroth wrote:What's next to go?
ANZAC day?
Blue Mountains Anzac Day marches cancelled as anti-terrorism measures drive up costs
Four Anzac Day marches have been cancelled in NSW's Blue Mountains region after the State Government introduced new anti-terrorism requirements, which RSL clubs say would cost them thousands of dollars to comply with.
The RSL sub-branches in Katoomba, Blackheath, Springwood and Glenbrook have cancelled their annual marches, which have been staged for almost 100 years.
Was last year's centenary the really the Last Hurrah?
It seems to me that instead of trying to implement elaborate barriers and anti terrorism procedures around just about every function, it would be far more cost effective (though not as politically correct of course) if we just implemented a much tighter barrier around our borders.
Immigration is okay, terrorism isn't. Our govt should look at exactly which countries/groups from our immigration lists are causing grief out of proportion to their numbers and cut back. Migrants who commit serious crime here and who are not Australian citizens should be deported.
Citizenship should not be easy to get-perhaps at least a 5-10 year residence here requirement and a probationary period after that.
on 15-01-2017 03:01 AM
Immigration is good for our economy as it provides the country with more customers for Business as well as kicking back more tax dollars to govt. (GST and PAYG)
That's the official line of argument as I understand it.
I think the reality is different.
Large scale immigration into a country where jobs are increasingly hard to get provides competition for those jobs and forces wages to fall in a relative sense as wel as an actual sense.
This is a "good thing" for Business (who are supposed to use their inceased profits to expand and re-invest and employ more people, but instead we all have seen how those profits are used to pay their chief executive officers ever higher salaries and give back money to their shareholders as a first priority.
So it's a "bad thing" for most working people.
It also means that immigrants will cost the government in terms of social support if they cannot find work. When I say "costs the government" I mean that it costs those who pay the government (that's us, the workers, the taxpayers . . . not to be confused with the mega corporations which earn billions and which our govt generously allows to avoid their taxation obligations.)
So, how to arrange to bring in a large number of job-seeking, wage-lowering consumers to help prop up struggling businesses who don't really believe in their own mantra of fair competition acting to lower prices and provide better service?
Oh, I know. We'll just find a bogus excuse to make war on foreign countries and produce millions of displaced people and then encourage them to emigrate to our place.
It's good for Business and we all eagerly anticpiate the trickle-down of the succulent crumbs which are sure to fall from the tables of the rich and mighty . . . eventually . . . one day . . . Hey, we were promised it would happen if only we trusted our politicians and voted for them, weren't we?
And some of us did.
Oh dear! We now have to worry about our govt policies encouraging and maybe even facilitating the immigration of people who might just feel a bit resentful and may even be . . . (shock and awe) . . . Terrorists?
No worries mate, we'll just use that as an exucse to enact even tougher policies re surveillance of your every facial tick and twitch . . . and your online reading habits . . . and your email and telephone conversations and put a few more CCTV cameras in our public places.
It's all for a good cause of course. It keeps you safer from those nasty terrorists (who we created in the first place because it makes us sooo much more money, but don't tell anyone because they wouldn't vote for us and then we'd be poor and have to find a real job on the outside where it's cold and harsh.)
Right now it seems that none of our politicians is worthy of our vote. and yet we continue to vote for them.
It's a real puzzle that we do this. Stupidity . . . doing the same thing over and over again in the expectation of a different result.
on 15-01-2017 11:29 AM
I'd agree with most of what you say, except I don't think we need to blame ourselves or our govt for the rise of every terrorist organisation. I think it is more complicated than that.
But we definitely should not be facilitating the immigration of any group that is punching above its weight when it comes to producing troublemakers, terrorists, criminals, unemployment.
15-01-2017 11:11 PM - edited 15-01-2017 11:12 PM
In Australia it's obligatory for us to cast a vote. There's no obligation to vote for any particular party or individual.
There's no legal obligation to cast a formal vote.
Time and time again our politicians (most of them from both sides of politics) have shown themselves to be representing themselves first and their donors from Business second and maybe even other interests before their obligation to represent the interests of their electorate (those folks who actually vote for them).
Since our politicians have demonstrated that they are unworthy of our vote then I do blame the ignorant and the self-interested who continue to give them their vote.
Voting for people like Pauline Hanson and Donald Trump is something I see as a sign of desperation and disillusionment with our traditional cast of "heroes".
It's bad enough to be saddled with the inept and grafting, mendacious pollies we already have without deliberately making it worse for ourselves.
We don't actually have to vote for anybody and if we do, knowing full well those pollies cannot be trusted then we really do deserve the govt we'll end up with.
"Troublemakers, terrorists and criminals" have their uses, especially if you are a member of a govt which wants an excuse to increase surveillance of its' citizens and also find excuses to make war on foreign countries in order to desabilise them and control their strategic assets.