on 07-02-2014 11:19 AM
...after the criminal banks!
Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood today called on the Abbott government to finally hold the banks accountable for their financial crimes, before it goes off on its crusade against union corruption.
Isherwood said, “In 2009 I called for an Australian Pecora Commission, modelled on the U.S. investigation of Wall Street led fearlessly by Ferdinand Pecora from 1932-34, which exposed the financial crimes that led to the Great Depression, and the corrupt dealings between the Wall Street banks and American politicians that enabled the banks to get away with their crimes.
“So far, outside of some Senate inquiries there has been no serious investigation of financial crimes in Australia. Yet after a few high-profile examples of union corruption, people in the Abbott government are pushing for a Royal Commission into the unions.
“I say investigate both,” he said, “but unless the government goes after the banks with the same zeal it has to tear into the unions, it is being corrupt itself, by covering up for corruption on a scale that crooked unionists could only dream of.”
Isherwood cited examples of the banks not being held accountable:
Isherwood noted that there have been numerous corporate collapses in recent years in which the losses were borne by the mum and dad investors but not the banks or the well-connected.
Isherwood concluded, “It is time to clean up the criminal activity in the financial system that has been allowed to flourish under the cover of deregulation.
“We must also impose the only effective regulation which can protect ordinary people from the predations of financial speculators, which is a Glass-Steagall separation of retail banking from investment banking.
“The only reason for the government to not launch a thorough investigation of criminality in the banking system, and not go with Glass-Steagall, is to cover for the bankers.
"The relationship between Macquarie Bank, aka the Millionaires’ Factory, and numerous ex-politicians and public servants who have gone to work for Macquarie after, in many cases, being involved in public policy decisions such as privatisations and public-private partnerships from which Macquarie directly profited."
on 07-02-2014 11:28 AM
If there unions are corrupt there is a good chance the companies are equally as corrupt.
It's not the unions who award the contracts.
on 07-02-2014 12:06 PM
It's the union thugs who have corrupted all the construction industry & they use criminal bikie gangs to intimidate.
We can only hope that the government initiates a Royal Commisision so rout these criminals out for the good of the country.
Historically the unions have been known to be corrupt, heavies,& death threats is their stock in trade. They maul anybody who tries to stand up to them, they destroy companies who don't toe the line, look at the war they have waged against the Grocon company for years.
It's a disgrace, something should be done but Union Bill isn't going to do anything, he's in thrall to the very corruption we see everyday reported.
on 07-02-2014 12:54 PM
AND throw the book at crooked politians, companies, developers, organisations, financial institutions, legal individuals and firms , and all individuals involved in corruption.
Not just those making bribes, but those accepting them.....and vice versa.
on 07-02-2014 01:00 PM
They need to start cleaning house a lot higher than unions.
Abstract
We study the degree of corruption in a hierarchical model of government. In particular,
we explore the question of whether adding a layer of government simply increases the
total amount of corruption or generates an organizational efficiency (via a principal-agent
relationship between levels of government) that reduces the total amount of corruption. It
is shown that when the after tax relative profitability of the formal sector as compared to
that of the informal sector is high enough, adding a layer of government does in fact
increase the total amount of corruption. On the other hand, for high enough public wages
and\or an efficient monitoring technology of the bureaucratic system, 'centralization' of
corruption at the top of the government hierarchy redistributes bribe income from the
lower level to the upper level but actually reduces total corruption in the process
http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/colloquia/materials/papers/Gardner_paper_corruption00.pdf
so who keeps tabs on the pollies
on 07-02-2014 01:21 PM
and today's comedy award goes too.................................
on 07-02-2014 01:31 PM
Here are the 10 least corrupt countries in the world, according to the index:
Here are the world's 10 most corrupt nations, starting with the worst:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/03/idUS95815491020131203
on 07-02-2014 01:36 PM
on 07-02-2014 01:37 PM
Imo, all this talk about union corruption is just to turn people against unions and people against other people.
It's all about driving wedges between people. The old divide and conquer routine.
on 07-02-2014 01:44 PM