on 28-05-2014 02:37 PM
German Magazine Bild has published a picture of Kate Middleton's bare bottom which was exposed as her dress flew up after she alighted from a helicopter during her recent visit to the Blue Mountains in NSW:
German newspaper Bild features the shot on their website along with another picture of Kate in Canada in 2011 when her yellow Jenny Packham dress did exactly the same thing.
Both pictures were taken shortly after she disembarked from a helicopter, with the wind from the propellers causing her dress to blow up.
The photographs have sparked comments online about why Kate doesn't wear weights in her hems like the Queen to avoid future wardrobe mishaps.
One Twitter user wrote: "Why doesn't she weight her hems?"
What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?
on 29-05-2014 05:46 AM
apologies,duff,"g-string" has a different connotation here.:)
on 29-05-2014 07:45 AM
no need to apologise Sin. I thought it was someone besides you that said it, from here.
on 29-05-2014 11:10 AM
@paintsew007 wrote:....just another 'distraction' story attempting to appease/distract the Aussie masses and discussion boards IMO.
There would be several images on the internet way before now if this were a true story. plenty of cameras around on the day IF true. A skirt does not blow up 'briefly' (no pun intended) under the influence of helicopter blade gusts.
Give me a break icy.
skirt hem looks weighted to me.
this should be good
distract the masses........from what
on 29-05-2014 11:13 AM
@paintsew007 wrote:....just another 'distraction' story attempting to appease/distract the Aussie masses and discussion boards IMO.
There would be several images on the internet way before now if this were a true story. plenty of cameras around on the day IF true. A skirt does not blow up 'briefly' (no pun intended) under the influence of helicopter blade gusts.
Give me a break icy.
skirt hem looks weighted to me.
this should be good
to distract the masses?
from what exactly?
on 29-05-2014 11:48 AM
@paintsew007 wrote:....just another 'distraction' story attempting to appease/distract the Aussie masses and discussion boards IMO.
There would be several images on the internet way before now if this were a true story. plenty of cameras around on the day IF true. A skirt does not blow up 'briefly' (no pun intended) under the influence of helicopter blade gusts.
Give me a break icy.
skirt hem looks weighted to me.
this should be good
who is trying to distract the masses? and from what?
on 29-05-2014 12:32 PM
Got a strong feeling about this topic or my pics Grizz?....LOL!
on 29-05-2014 12:37 PM
@paintsew007 wrote:Got a strong feeling about this topic or my pics Grizz?....LOL!
He must be hoping the yellow dress will give a flash of bum cheek if it gets a flurry of postings.
29-05-2014 12:56 PM - edited 29-05-2014 12:57 PM
on 29-05-2014 01:11 PM
thanks. i'm reading voraciously to avoid confusion when possible.:)
on 02-06-2014 11:58 AM
Update:
The world let out a collective ‘OMGWTF’ when German tabloid Bild distastefully printed pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge’s accidentally-flashed behind recently.
It was briefly exposed when a rogue gust of wind came into play on a helipad while she was visiting Australia’s Blue Mountains.
Now, Catherine has taken preventative measures against having her bum ever appear in the media again – by hiring its very own bodyguard.
This new addition to her security detail isn’t your stereotypical beefed-up dude who could deflect a bullet off his chest though; it’s a ‘female minder’ who will hang with the Duchess while she goes shopping and on holidays.
was she trying to out-bum Pippa?