on 28-05-2014 02:37 PM
German Magazine Bild has published a picture of Kate Middleton's bare bottom which was exposed as her dress flew up after she alighted from a helicopter during her recent visit to the Blue Mountains in NSW:
German newspaper Bild features the shot on their website along with another picture of Kate in Canada in 2011 when her yellow Jenny Packham dress did exactly the same thing.
Both pictures were taken shortly after she disembarked from a helicopter, with the wind from the propellers causing her dress to blow up.
The photographs have sparked comments online about why Kate doesn't wear weights in her hems like the Queen to avoid future wardrobe mishaps.
One Twitter user wrote: "Why doesn't she weight her hems?"
What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?
on 02-06-2014 12:48 PM
Surely she had an appointed lady-in-waiting shortly after marrying Wills. I tend to think someone has been given the "b.u.m.'s rush" and a new Lady hired.
DEB
on 02-06-2014 12:50 PM
@lloydslights wrote:
Surely she had an appointed lady-in-waiting shortly after marrying Wills. I tend to think someone has been given the "b.u.m.'s rush" and a new Lady hired.
DEB