Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

The trapping and rehoming of feral horses in the Kosciuszko National Park has resumed after the Land and Environment Court dismissed a bid to stop the practice.

The Snowy Mountains Brumby Sustainability and Management Group (SMBSMG) tried to stop brumbies from being trapped and removed from three sensitive areas of the park, but the court upheld a 2008 horse management plan.

The National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Southern Ranges director, Mick Pettitt, said the service was luring brumbies to yards with salt and molasses since May and the first horses were removed this week.

"We actually removed 12 horses yesterday," he said.

"We have got, at this stage, room for 155 horses for rehomers who have put their hand up to take that number of horses.

 

Read more here 

 

That's only a fraction of the horses that need to be removed, though. What about the rest?

Message 1 of 20
Latest reply
19 REPLIES 19

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

The greatest tribute that could be paid to the Brumbies would be to break some of them in and introduce them to equestrian sports.....the show ring, jumping, pony club....the list goes on.

They also make great working horses....ask any cattleman who has them in work.

 

Leaving them to roam is doing them a great disservice.....people see wild horses destroying a fragile ecosystem and label them pests when they deserve much more than that.

Message 11 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins


@icyfroth wrote:

I get what you're saying Roges. The Brumbies do share some cultural history with white Australians, and do deserve a place in our hearts.

 

Still. While they're roaming free, they're destroying the environnemt and habitat of even more deserving creatures, the native wildlife of this continent.

 

I'm thinking, we could keep the Brumbie breed alive and honour their contribution by holding them in contolled numbers as the 155 that are being rehomed.

 

Unfortunately, many must be sacrificed, as were their ancestors who were taken off to war, but not brought back.


well at 10's thousands yes i imagine some damage but reduce to say 500 as  representitive herds living within 1.2 million hectares of  the Australian Alps region i think for historic reasons would be justified 

 

( btw many black fellas used horses when employed as jackaroos - and i am sure in the highlands they were good eating, a food source that did not conflict with sheep/cattle interests ) 

Message 12 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins


@rogespeed wrote:


well at 10's thousands yes i imagine some damage but reduce to say 500 as  representitive herds living within 1.2 million hectares of  the Australian Alps region i think for historic reasons would be justified

Good grief.....have you any idea what you are saying?

Tens of thousands of horses in the wild would do incalculable damage....not to mention how many would starve and die of thirst in our inhospitable climate.

 

Even 500 is too many to be roaming free in the Alps.   I have seen first hand how 6 horses on 10 acres can denude the grass and damge the natural water supply....and that is with daily feeding and watering and regular attention from the owners.

 

 

( btw many black fellas used horses when employed as jackaroos - and i am sure in the highlands they were good eating, a food source that did not conflict with sheep/cattle interests ) 

Black fellas?Smiley Surprised  Not very PC are we?

Yes, the aboriginal stockmen used horses which were owned by their employers.....not brumbies that they caught in the wild.

They did not eat horse meat....at least those that lived and worked on properties did not.

Part of their wages consisted of meat and foodstuffs provided by their employer.  That would be whatever animals were on the property....beef or lamb, and whatever kangaroos and goannas they could trap.


 

Message 13 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

Lyndal - you got it in one.

 

' Do you have any idea ' .

Message 14 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

May I just say - this person seems to have an opinion on everthing - from N's - to horses.

 

I wonder when - just when - was the last time - an horse (correct, lol) was even in his direct vision - close.

 

Seems to be a jack of all - master of NONE.

 

And so effing wordy. 

Message 15 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins


@lyndal1838 wrote:

@rogespeed wrote:


well at 10's thousands yes i imagine some damage but reduce to say 500 as  representitive herds living within 1.2 million hectares of  the Australian Alps region i think for historic reasons would be justified

Good grief.....have you any idea what you are saying?

Tens of thousands of horses in the wild would do incalculable damage....not to mention how many would starve and die of thirst in our inhospitable climate.

 

Even 500 is too many to be roaming free in the Alps.   I have seen first hand how 6 horses on 10 acres can denude the grass and damge the natural water supply....and that is with daily feeding and watering and regular attention from the owners.

 

 

( btw many black fellas used horses when employed as jackaroos - and i am sure in the highlands they were good eating, a food source that did not conflict with sheep/cattle interests ) 

Black fellas?Smiley Surprised  Not very PC are we?

Yes, the aboriginal stockmen used horses which were owned by their employers.....not brumbies that they caught in the wild.

They did not eat horse meat....at least those that lived and worked on properties did not.

Part of their wages consisted of meat and foodstuffs provided by their employer.  That would be whatever animals were on the property....beef or lamb, and whatever kangaroos and goannas they could trap.


 


They do not resent that term , black of black fellas , so who are you ? 

Message 16 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins


@lyndal1838 wrote:

@rogespeed wrote:


well at 10's thousands yes i imagine some damage but reduce to say 500 as  representitive herds living within 1.2 million hectares of  the Australian Alps region i think for historic reasons would be justified

Good grief.....have you any idea what you are saying?

Tens of thousands of horses in the wild would do incalculable damage....not to mention how many would starve and die of thirst in our inhospitable climate.

 

Even 500 is too many to be roaming free in the Alps.   I have seen first hand how 6 horses on 10 acres can denude the grass and damge the natural water supply....and that is with daily feeding and watering and regular attention from the owners.

 

 

( btw many black fellas used horses when employed as jackaroos - and i am sure in the highlands they were good eating, a food source that did not conflict with sheep/cattle interests ) 

Black fellas?Smiley Surprised  Not very PC are we?

Yes, the aboriginal stockmen used horses which were owned by their employers.....not brumbies that they caught in the wild.

They did not eat horse meat....at least those that lived and worked on properties did not.

Part of their wages consisted of meat and foodstuffs provided by their employer.  That would be whatever animals were on the property....beef or lamb, and whatever kangaroos and goannas they could trap.


 


Was not talking about stockman eating brumbies , but the tribes in the high country during the 1800's ( horses hunted or carrion) - the brumby issue in this post relates to horses in the high country national parks 

Message 17 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

Get them all gelded and they will die out naturally

Message 18 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

Easier said than done.....and how much damage will be done before they all die?

Message 19 of 20
Latest reply

Trapping and rehoming of brumbies begins

Try getting up close and personal enough to geld a wild horse without getting kicked death...

Simple.

Message 20 of 20
Latest reply