Turnbull routed

[idlewhile]

Ballot 61 to 39 in favour of not having a spill.

[polksaladallie]

---

@karliandjacko wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Secret ballot.  See the ballot paper in Post #36.

---

Is that not a joke image?  

Oh dear.  Any bets being taken on who said that?

---

I don't know if it is genuine or not.  It certainly fits Ruddock's description of the informal vote.

And it is easy to leak stuff these days.

[karliandjacko]

Gambaro perhaps?

[polksaladallie]

Nooooooooooooooooo.  I have some friends who are close to her, and while I do not talk to them about her, she would not do that. 

[cherry*135]

---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@am*3 wrote:

Is this articulate?

Obviously I respect the party room, I absolutely respect the party room and the party room will be getting a secret ballot tomorrow, so that the result tomorrow will be something the accurately reflects views inside the party room.

---

moving forward....

lol   get over it, move on,  we all know where your bias lies so trying to cover every post you don't agree with is .....  to say the least, and must be exhausting, all that looking up of quotes, all that c&p and correcting and lecturing must take up all your time.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

I take it your answer is a No, then? Not much point moving on from inarticulate PM's while Abbott is still in the job.

Not in the least exhausting, most of the news online I read before I even look at these threads. Your assumptions are incorrect.

[cherry*135]

Quote - [Turnbull] he waffles and takes the long way round to answer any question..

So does the PM

No, you would expect the Australian government to want to get the best value, you would expect the Australian government to get the best product, and you would expect the Australian Govt to give Australian suppliers a fair go.

These quotes are very recent by the way.

[karliandjacko]

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Nooooooooooooooooo.  I have some friends who are close to her, and while I do not talk to them about her, she would not do that. 

---

😄  She was the only one I could think of that might be that annoyed... 

[poddster]

Am3, you seem to be very media driven and seem to lap up anything and everything that the media disgorge.

No wonder you predictions are worthless.

Perhaps the application of some original thought and a bit of logic could cure your lack of accuracy 🙂

[cherry*135]

---

@poddster wrote:

Am3, you seem to be very media driven and seem to lap up anything and everything that the media disgorge.

No wonder you predictions are worthless.

Perhaps the application of some original thought and a bit of logic could cure your lack of accuracy 🙂

---

Didn't you already post that and I replied I disagreed with it  - very  much all false assumptions.

It is only your view.. do you think if you keep repeating the same way, you are doing it  as a way of trying to force your view on others?

My prediction is still to come true....watch this space.

[poddster]

Watrching with keen interest 🙂

[cherry*135]

Lucky you. Nothing to do with me, what you do.

I will continue as usual. 

And that is that it's not over yet. Monday's spill motion was the first shot. It's coming back and Abbott's authority has been crushed.

With almost 40 per cent of the Liberal party room effectively expressing no confidence in its leader, Abbott's prime ministership still looks terminal.

As thrilled as Labor is with that prospect, it would prefer to face a damaged prime minister at the next election rather than a popular one enjoying a new honeymoon period.

"Turnbull would have got a nice honeymoon if he had become leader today," one senior Labor MP said.

"He's a bigger danger for us. People like him."

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/labor-prepares-for-prime-minister...