30-08-2013 10:19 AM - edited 30-08-2013 10:20 AM
We all seem to be ignoring the elephant in the room ( no offence intended to our resident pink pachyderm):
UN powers deadlocked as Assad vows resistance
NEW YORK (AFP) - The United States made it clear Thursday that it was ready to act alone to launch a punitive strike against Syria's chemical-armed regime, as top UN powers remained deadlocked.
Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad vowed to resist any military intervention, and the governments of US allies Britain and France struggled to win domestic political backing for action.
Key US ally Britain had mounted an improbable bid to win UN backing for military action, but a meeting of the permanent Security Council members broke with no apparent breakthrough.
The 45-minute meeting was the second since Britain proposed a draft resolution to permit "all necessary measures" to protect Syrian civilians after a suspected chemical weapons attack last week.
US warships armed with scores of cruise missiles are converging on the eastern Mediterranean, and US military officials have said they are ready to launch a powerful barrage against regime targets in Syria.
Assad's ally Russia has blocked all attempts to toughen international sanctions against Damascus or authorize outside force to punish or unseat the regime.
Assad remained defiant in the face of the Western threats.
"Syria will defend itself in the face of any aggression," state television cited him as telling a visiting delegation of Yemeni politicians.
He vowed that any attack would result in "victory" for the Syrian people.
His regime has denied using chemical weapons and blamed "terrorist" rebels.
Click here to read whole article: http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/18700561/assad-vows-to-defend-syria-amid-military-buildup/
The US would have to be the most war-mongering nation since Rome!
Why don't they butt out of middle-eastern politics?
They say they have a humanitarian duty to intervene but they are just destabilising the whole region and contributing to civilian deaths.
on 30-08-2013 10:35 AM
i agree with you.
stinks of iraq ..
on 30-08-2013 11:30 AM
Doesn't happen all that often Lakey, but 100% agree with you here.
on 30-08-2013 11:31 AM
apparently Assad does not allow genetically modified crops in his country to preserve the health of his people, so why use chemical weapons on them.
but then there is this
“We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran” —
General Wesley Clark. Retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied
Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia .
on 30-08-2013 11:33 AM
to permit "all necessary measures" to protect Syrian civilians
Which would ultimately mean going in and killing thousands more of them, calling it "collateral damage" (as history shows)
on 30-08-2013 11:35 AM
apparently Assad does not allow genetically modified crops in his country
There we have one motive. In one particular giant corporation who dictates to the US Govt, wanting to distribute their GM crops across the globe.
on 30-08-2013 11:39 AM
on 30-08-2013 11:50 AM
Of course, I know I'll soon wear the label "Conspiracy theorist".
on 30-08-2013 11:53 AM
I'm surprised the labellers haven't jumped in yet
on 30-08-2013 12:00 PM
was my first thought Icy.