Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

silverfaun
Community Member

This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

 

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate  is appalling.

 

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

 

 

SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.

 

He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.

 

Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.

 

This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.

 

But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.

 

“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.

 

Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.

 

Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.

 

Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.

 

We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.

 

“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”

 

So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.

On what evidence?

 

This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.

 

Message 1 of 265
Latest reply
264 REPLIES 264

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@izabsmiling wrote:

this is so logical to me...I just don't know how I can manage to explain so that you can understand.

 

a red head is a red head even if they don't 'feel' like a red head ...a fact is a fact .

The daughters were exploited  (used) in an attempt to buy our votes to help Tony Abbott advance to the PM of our Country.


 

 

really?  what is your definition of logic?

 

 

 

 

Message 181 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@**meep** wrote:

izabsmiling wrote: I don't see those published here .

 

 

I have seen them published here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


meep, you are wasting your time trying to put a reasonable comment across, the hate is too much to cut through.

 

The sickening comments on the two lovely young women supporting their father is looked upon as something truly sickening by the rusted on left on here.

 

I would be proud to have young daughters like that but somehow that is looked upon as something hateful and shameful.

Message 182 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

@**meep** wrote:

izabsmiling wrote: I don't see those published here .

 

 

I have seen them published here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


meep, you are wasting your time trying to put a reasonable comment across, the hate is too much to cut through.

 

The sickening comments on the two lovely young women supporting their father is looked upon as something truly sickening by the rusted on left on here.

 

I would be proud to have young daughters like that but somehow that is looked upon as something hateful and shameful.


Woman LOLWoman LOLWoman LOLhilarious.

Message 183 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

"The daughters were exploited (used) in an attempt to buy our votes to help Tony Abbott advance to the PM of our Country."

That is an opinion held by the person who wrote that and possibly others. However, opinions are not facts.

The young women involved (adults) didn't feel exploited. Their choice to do that. They weren't forced to do appearances for $1 a day.

If people voted for TA on the strength he took his daughters on the campaign trail that is their prerogative... Nothing to do with exploitation or being misled about anything. Voters free will to do so, just like some younger high earning women might have chosen to vote for him on the strength of his paid parental leave scheme.
Message 184 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Pollies' daughters are doing it for us all (SMH)

.........But daughters in politics are indeed a force of their own. Having daughters makes male executives more generous to their female employees, according to a 2012 study, Fatherhood and Managerial Style. And where politicians are concerned, the effects of daughters are readily identifiable.

The Yale economist Ebonya Washington, in her 2008 study, Female Socialisation: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers' Voting On Women's Issues, Yale economist Ebonya Washington found that there was a distinct gap between the way male and female members of Congress voted on women's issues, but every daughter born to a male congressman closed that gap, on average, by one-quarter. That is to say men changed their minds on women's issues more and more with each daughter they fathered.
This is exciting news, because it means in legislative terms that Tony Abbott is now 75 per cent female, which explains not only his conversion on parental leave, but also his recent interest in really nice shirts.

Don't just accept the Abbott example, though. Paul Keating, who entered Parliament in 1970, declared in his maiden speech the increasing number of women in the workforce was ''something of which we should be ashamed''. Two daughters, a quarter of a century and countless bracing sessions with Summers later, he had come around to a federal childcare system of which his 1970 self would have disapproved.

Then John Howard was elected, in 1996, and cut childcare funding. He was openly of the view that women should be supported in their decision to stay at home with their children. But eight years later, by which time his beloved daughter Melanie was 30, a successful lawyer and contemplating a family of her own, he introduced the 30 per cent childcare rebate.

Bob Hawke's daughters changed the way he communicated with a nation.

I continue to suspect Kevin Rudd's daughter of teaching him how to tweet, a grave intervention, as history will no doubt affirm.

Former United States vice-president Dick Cheney, a man so relentlessly hard-**bleep** that he shot his own mate while hunting and wasn't, let's be honest, all that sorry, quietly defied his own president in 2004 when George W. Bush sought federally to outlaw gay marriage, because his lesbian daughter was happy, in love, and planning a family.

So on this International Women's Day, here's to daughters. Here's to mine, who I hope will do whatever they **bleep** well please, except, of course, insofar as that might prove inconsistent with my own preferences. And here's to Tony Abbott's. Whatever anyone says or thinks about this particular paid parental leave scheme, you three chicks have played a blinder.

March 9, 2014

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/pollies-daughters-are-doing-it-for-us-all-20140308-34dvc.html#ixzz2vX3...
Message 185 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

@**meep** wrote:

izabsmiling wrote: I don't see those published here .

 

 

I have seen them published here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


meep, you are wasting your time trying to put a reasonable comment across, the hate is too much to cut through.

 

The sickening comments on the two lovely young women supporting their father is looked upon as something truly sickening by the rusted on left on here.

 

I would be proud to have young daughters like that but somehow that is looked upon as something hateful and shameful.


please support your statements with evidence  or don't publish it about me 

Message 186 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

read around ...this from France 

 
 
MAD MONK09/08/2013 at 17h48

Sexist, redneck: Here Tony Abbott, new Australian Prime Minister

Renée Greusard | Journalist

 

 
A guy who would sell his daughters?

 

If Tony Abbott was able to win in this election is that it was able to adequately control its image during the campaign and focus on the cool capital of his daughters. Unlike him, they are ainsifavorables gay marriage.

As says the blog Monde.fr Australia, Friday, Aug. 6, at the end of the race, he still missed this gem about them. Whether to vote for him is because he was "the guy with two girls not unpleasant to look at."

 

 http://rue89.nouvelobs.com/2013/09/08/sexiste-beauf-voici-tony-abbott-nouveau-premier-ministre-austr...

 

 

So, to sum up, this newspaper portrays Tony Abbott as a bigoted, sexist, misogynistic, xenophobic, racist climate change denying redneck who pimps his own daugthers. I would say they nailed him pretty well and you voted for him Australia. Don’t blame me, I didn’t and he doesn’t represent me.  The original article in all it’s French glory is here.

 

http://uknowispeaksense.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/a-man-who-would-sell-his-daughters/

 

 

Message 187 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

wow Iza, I think you've managed to give unhinged vitriolic speech a whole new meaning

Message 188 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

The PM has 3 intelligent adult daughters. Continual posts about their father pimping them out ( when they accompanied him on his campaign trail)says more about the poster than it does about the PM, in my humble opinion.

Who is trying to convince who of what and why? Nothing illegal went on.
Message 189 of 265
Latest reply

Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

the shame is not pointing out that the acts fit particular English words ....

 

if anyone find those words offensive and they do by defintion fit the cap....it is the cap wearer you should logically have a problem with.

not an observer who points out that the words fit.

 

the cap wearer of course being our PM.

Message 190 of 265
Latest reply