on 08-03-2014 09:39 AM
This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.
The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate is appalling.
I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:
SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.
He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.
Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.
This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.
But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.
“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.
Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.
Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.
Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.
We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.
“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”
So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.
On what evidence?
This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.
No matter how calmly it is presented, unhinged hatred can’t help anyone.
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-03-2014 05:47 PM - edited 08-03-2014 05:49 PM
on 08-03-2014 06:12 PM
@silverfaun wrote:The little inconsequent can stand up in cowards castle and slim and slur everybody but runs a mile if he's invited to speak outside. Like I said: gormless.
Roll on election and lets get rid of him.
would you stand face to face with him or anyone else and make comments such as these ?
on 08-03-2014 06:18 PM
@izabsmiling wrote:
@silverfaun wrote:The little inconsequent can stand up in cowards castle and slim and slur everybody but runs a mile if he's invited to speak outside. Like I said: gormless.
Roll on election and lets get rid of him.
would you stand face to face with him or anyone else and make comments such as these ?
As I'm never likely to meet him as I don't travel in that sewer, not like him cowering in cowards castle. I'm only saying what many think of him.
Why do you ask? seeing as you agree and are delighted with his speech, many are not and are entitled to say so.
on 08-03-2014 06:21 PM
excuse me? interpersonal?
on 08-03-2014 06:22 PM
More like he wants his cushy parlimentary job back,
But isn't that the reason any candidate stands in an election?
Isn't it the reason Tony Abbott stood as a candidate in the last election
You'd have to be pretty dumb to put yourself forward as a candidate if you didn't want a seat in parliamnent?
And Is the parliamentary job he is hoping to get more cushy than that of Prime Minister?
he sees as his right, regardless of a democratically legitimate government being elected.
Maybe you should have thought a bit more carefully before posting that statement. It is actually because we have a legitimate democratically elected government that we were having this by-election at all.
You may not have intended it, but your comment implies that you believe because we currently have an LNP govermnent, members of other parities should not have the right to put themelves forward as candidates - not what I call very democratic.
on 08-03-2014 06:23 PM
on 08-03-2014 06:23 PM
it's a fact.
on 08-03-2014 06:26 PM
Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech
"I don't travel in that sewer, not like him cowering in cowards castle."
OOPS?????
on 08-03-2014 06:30 PM
As much as I'd like to reply to all responses I'm sure you can understand that to do so will prob result in a slap, so keep replying I'm enjoying all your responses.
on 08-03-2014 06:31 PM
“Hello, everyone. This thread is getting a little interpersonal.
Please discuss differences of political persuasion without being interpersonal and insulting.
Thanks.