on 07-07-2014 09:04 PM
The High Court has issued an interim injunction preventing the transfer to Sri Lanka of 153 asylum seekers who are missing on a boat bound for Australia.
The injunction, granted late on Monday in Sydney, applies at least until a hearing resumes on Tuesday afternoon at 2.15pm.
The asylum seekers are represented by Ron Merkel, QC, who argued to Justice Susan Crennan that the transfer was illegal because the asylum seekers had been deprived the ability to have their claims properly assessed.
But it is not clear whether the transfer has already taken place because Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has refused to comment and his lawyers told the court they had not received instructions.
Sources said lawyers were representing the asylum seekers through their families and they have not been in touch with them since contact was lost more than a week ago.
All you have to do to stop this kind of thing is to communicate. It can't be that hard surely?
on 08-07-2014 08:53 AM
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/07/us-sri-lanka-australia-idUSKBN0FC00N20140707
shameful what we've done here
on 08-07-2014 09:09 AM
to OP ref....."Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has refused to comment...."
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
one of the few times a politician can be ordered to keep their mouth closed - pending Court action.
........The High Court I believe.
on 08-07-2014 10:55 AM
"We only have Morrisons word that they were Sinhalese.. And his word counts for nothing and can't be trusted with the truth.
Personally I don't believe him and I suspect that they were Tamils. Hence the Sri Lankans speed in imprisoning them."
Make up your mind , first Morrison is criticised for not talking, then when he does, and it is not palatable, it is dismissed.
I suggest you accept what is being reported by all the media outlets as to the background of the passengers (they are in Sri Lanka now) and the comment that they will all be released on bail (apart from the crew) because under Sri Lanka law they could have committed an emigration offence.
I believe what is widely reported as the ethnic composition of the passengers.
nɥºɾ
on 08-07-2014 11:03 AM
i agree with you i-needa:
We only have Morrisons word that they were Sinhalese.. And his word counts for nothing and can't be trusted with the truth.
Personally I don't believe him and I suspect that they were Tamils. Hence the Sri Lankans speed in imprisoning them.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Morrison cannot be trusted or believed
on 08-07-2014 11:36 AM
So monman you think we can trust a politician that states "there is no incident occurring on sea" when:
No incidence?
on 08-07-2014 11:37 AM
Overheard at supermarket checkout.... checkout operator to customer
Send them all back.... I still don't know what they're coming here for anyway.
No guesses which way this person would have voted in the newspaper poll.
on 08-07-2014 11:51 AM
08-07-2014 12:15 PM - edited 08-07-2014 12:17 PM
I believe what is widely reported as the ethnic composition of the passengers.
That is a surprisingly nebulous statement from someone usually so meticulous in quoting his sources.
I have seen at least one poster here taken severely to task by you for offering similarly vague statements to justify a disbelief in climate channge.
on 08-07-2014 12:59 PM
replying to cherples who said:
Overheard at supermarket checkout.... checkout operator to customer
Send them all back.... I still don't know what they're coming here for anyway......
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
sad. .....though understandable if this person does not have any comprehension as to the 'why'
on 08-07-2014 01:10 PM
@paintsew007 wrote:replying to cherples who said:
Overheard at supermarket checkout.... checkout operator to customer
Send them all back.... I still don't know what they're coming here for anyway......
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
sad. .....though understandable if this person does not have any comprehension as to the 'why'
Yes and easy to see why the send em back vote is meaningless. How can anyone give an informed answer if they don't have a clue what the question is about.