on 05-02-2016 12:02 PM
A university worker who allegedly told three white students to leave an Indigenous computer lab has launched a $250,000 legal action claiming racial discrimination.
Cindy Prior, a former employee of the Queensland University of Technology’s Indigenous office, has launched the action against five students and three staff members.
When the three male students were attempting to access computers in the Oodgeroo Unit at the university’s Brisbane campus in May 2013, Ms Prior asked them ‘whether they were Indigneous’, according to court documents seen by the Daily Mail.
She allegedly told the men they were in ‘an Indigenous space for Aboriginal Torres Strait students’ and asked them to leave.
A short while later one of the students logged on to the QUT Stalker Space Facebook page to vent about the experience.
“I wonder where the white supremacist computer lab is,” Jackson Powell wrote according to court documents.
Another student Calum Thwaites allegedly said: “ITT n*****s”, however he strongly denies writing the slur.
Kyran Findlater, the third student involved, also posted comments online according to the Federal Circuit Court documents.
“My Student and Amenity fees are going to furbish rooms in the university where inequality reigns supreme?” he is reported to have written.
“I believe if we have to pay to support these sorts of places, there should at least be more created for general purpose use, but again, how do these sorts of facilities support interaction and community within QUT? All this does is encourage separation and inequality".
When equity director Mary Kelly reviewed the Facebook comments, she allegedly told Ms Prior it was just ‘students being nasty'.
“With the small amount of contact I’ve had with the students, it is clear that these students aren’t racist.
“There is no white supremacy group at QUT. Check out what racial vilification is before you jump in.
“They’re not going to come into your office with a baseball bat,” the documents quoted Ms Kelly as saying.
Why were all the equality and equity laws passed when all they do is create inequality?
on 05-02-2016 03:50 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:So what you are saying is it's OK to make special rules to assist the physically disadvantaged, but not to assist the socially disadvantaged.
where are the socially disadvantaged in this case?
on 05-02-2016 03:58 PM
no. that is not what i am saying at all.
i am saying the students who
wanted to use the computers which
were not in use, should not have been
questioned about their ethnicity.
to me, it would be similar to providing
prayer rooms. while they are not in
use for the designated religious groups,
anyone is able to access them
for their personal (spiritual??) needs.
i don't think a university would make
a rule of exclusion based on race,
religion or sexual orientation.
that would be discrimination.
on 05-02-2016 04:45 PM
It was straight out bigotry and discriminatiion and when she got called out for it she filed suit to take the heat off her.
on 05-02-2016 06:05 PM
on 05-02-2016 06:40 PM
@djilukjilly wrote:It was straight out bigotry and discriminatiion and when she got called out for it she filed suit to take the heat off her.
I stand in awe of your psychic omniscience.
on 05-02-2016 06:58 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:. Ms Prior said she felt “sick, furious and distraught” after the comments of Dr Hayes.
really? wow.....
I'll echo that. Really? Wow ........
on 05-02-2016 07:09 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@djilukjilly wrote:It was straight out bigotry and discriminatiion and when she got called out for it she filed suit to take the heat off her.
I stand in awe of your psychic omniscience.
lol... if you can't baffle 'em with bullspit, try dazzling 'em with brilliance
on 05-02-2016 07:14 PM
I wonder if Cindy Prior would be aghast to learn that the computers and operating systems may have been invented by a non-indigenous person.
on 05-02-2016 07:35 PM
@village_person wrote:I wonder if Cindy Prior would be aghast to learn that the computers and operating systems may have been invented by a non-indigenous person.
On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd say that possibility is probably a minus 5
on 05-02-2016 07:38 PM
does it matter, if there's guilt money to be extracted?