on โ03-06-2013 09:45 PM
on โ05-06-2013 01:39 PM
on here it is a derogatory term that a handful of id's use to try to irritate the posters who are not biased towards the opposition.
*gasps slowly* My gosh, azureline, as an honest-to-goodness admirer of our resident "Granny with Grunt", your comment above is perhaps the most astute, intelligent thing I have ever seen you write...
on โ05-06-2013 01:43 PM
so when the opposition is no longer the opposition, who will then be the luvvies?
on โ05-06-2013 01:59 PM
there will always be an opposition.....
on โ05-06-2013 02:18 PM
so the term "luvvies" is interchangeable then, regardless of which party is the opposition?
on โ05-06-2013 02:54 PM
so the term "luvvies" is interchangeable then, regardless of which party is the opposition?
no. its a derisory term, a stereotype aimed at anyone who gives a toss or doesn't drink to excess like akerman.. someone lacking his bitterness. its his putdown on decent people.
a rather pathetic one. i have a much better term for the likes of him, but its verboten here.
on โ05-06-2013 02:55 PM
The people who can use who's and whose correctly.
LIKE
on โ05-06-2013 02:58 PM
i don't think it was a spelling error. ๐
You are right... It was grammatical...
on โ05-06-2013 04:03 PM
Still funny though that the spelling and grammar queen spelled a word in the title of their own thread incorrectly.
on โ05-06-2013 04:28 PM
is Bob a girl?
on โ05-06-2013 04:42 PM
I thought Bob was a boy.