Who to believe?

 David Suzuki or Andrew Bolt ?

 i tend to go with Suzuki, he has the qualifications and expertise in his field. Andrew is a journalist, not even a good journalist ..with only a sketchy grasp of climate denial, he doesn't really even have a proper grasp of what he's talking about.

when you have a toothache, don't go to andrew. go to a dentist. when climate is the field, go to Suzuki.

Message 1 of 16
Latest reply
15 REPLIES 15

Who to believe?

a blow by blow de-bunk of dolt's quotes, rants, how he's proven time after time,  to be wrong :

 

Andrew Bolt's Lies, Deceptions & Misrepresentations on AGW
A catalogue of his scientific illiteracy

 
About

"Andrew Bolt has been misrepresenting, deceiving and lying about AGW as an issue for a long time now.

He has denigrated science and scientists with apparently no accountability.

He has refused to admit error or to correct misconceptions that he has created.

This blog is to set the record straight and to put on the record how disingenuous and politically-motivated this individual has been in relation to a subject that he very clearly has very little grasp or understanding.

For those real sceptics that would like scientifically based information on the contentious climate change issues, I recommend SkepticalScience.

One of the best resources for answering questions on climate science issues is RealClimate."

 

 

http://andrewboltliesdeceptionsonagw.wordpress.com

Message 11 of 16
Latest reply

Who to believe?


@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

David Suzuki has no qualifications in Climatology, so no I wouldn't go to him...

 

Andrew Bolt can only  quote and comment on the ridiculously embarrassing statements made by David Suzuki,....as can I.....giggle.

 

 

 

Woman LOLWoman LOL


What would your qualifications be, since you consider yourself to be more learned in the subject?

Message 12 of 16
Latest reply

Who to believe?

Bolt couldn't even complete a basic university degree.   (Love to know the story behind that).   So he is a half-baked journalist IMO.

Message 13 of 16
Latest reply

Who to believe?

When Andrew Bolt produces headlines like - 

 

David Suzuki proves he’s pig ignorant about global warming

 

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/david_suzuki_proves_hes_p...

 

I must admit I do giggle...just a bit....Woman Very Happy



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............
Message 14 of 16
Latest reply

Who to believe?

I think we should just ignore the shrill, hysterically shrieking, Bolt quoting posters, and maybe they just go away.

Or maybe not; anybody who was not sure about what to think about climate change may after reading their ravings start having doubts about the deniers mental state  🙂

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 15 of 16
Latest reply

Who to believe?

the shrill, hysterically shrieking, Bolt quoting posters  

 

Man Happy

Message 16 of 16
Latest reply