Why are the Labor/Lefties so concerned about Indonesia?

[nero_bolt]

Why are the Labor/Lefties so concerned about Indonesia?

They seem obsessed about Indonesia

They seem to think that we in Australia should bow down to Indonesia

They seem to think that we all should be at Indonesia's mercy 

Indonesia doesnt have the concerns about us like the lefties do about Indonesia

The left keep on and on and on and on about Indonesia and what we should do and how we should do it etc

So again the question... Why are the Labor/Lefties so concerned about Indonesia?

Me I couldnt care less this is Australia not Indonesia and we should worry about ourselves and look after our country and people and not Indonesia 

So again the question... Why are the Labor/Lefties so concerned about Indonesia?    (Or is that obsessed)

Maybe as they are so concerned and Australia is so evil to Indonesia all the lefties should move there as they would from all the posts on here be far happier living there than in evil Australia.....

[silverfaun]

Maybe she got a job with a big monolithic American multi national , so she can  do it all again, with no restraints.

[silverfaun]

She could nanny the whole world

[*crikey*mate*]

---

@silverfaun wrote:

Hello, didnt Nicola Roxon resign?? you know the one who thought and tried to nanny the whole of Australia as if they were not capable of adult thinking.

The one who tried to make it illegal to offend and to take away the presumption of innonence. ...Just asking.

---

There is already some legislation where the presumption of innocence is reversed. ie the onus is on the accused to prove innocence rather than for the crown to prove guilt.

[silverfaun]

Do you have any examples or articles of proof for that statement??

[silverfaun]

---

@jethro_woolfe wrote:

There's no need for the embarrassed laughing face thing, its to the governments shame not yours unless you turn a blind eye.           Its to the govts. shame???? that would be the Labor govt. wouldnt it.

---

[*crikey*mate*]

---

@silverfaun wrote:

Do you have any examples or articles of proof for that statement??

---

off the top of my head, proceeds of crime act.

its on google

[silverfaun]

Proceeds of crime have to be proved in  court. That is not an example of proof of your statement.

[*crikey*mate*]

I am afraid that you are wrong.

Authorities may seize any assets/funds etc under that Act and the accused must prove that they are NOT proceeds of crime

guilty until proven innocent, which is what i said

[silverfaun]

So you are in favour of that scenario Roxon put up "guilty until proved innocent" are you ? or are you just defending what that despicable woman tried to do to ALL Australians.

Don't answer I think I know what you will say & it's not something ever I want to hear an Australian utter in the 21st century.

[pct001wine]

A little bit of confected outrage on your Weeties this morning anyone ?