on โ03-07-2015 10:50 PM
Like the tatts? Hate the tatts? Yeah, whatever, it's their choice...?
Discuss, enlighten me with your views.
on โ05-07-2015 05:19 PM
@joz*garage wrote:maybe people with tatts should get with the times, hbh, decorating oneself was a tribal thing
personally ive never found women with tatts attractive, more a turn off
each to their own
.. i found kissing a smoker a turn off. Hardly the same thing though is it. One is covered in ink, the other is covered in Stink!
on โ05-07-2015 06:34 PM
they sure do, it even comes through on some of their postings, lmao
on โ05-07-2015 06:42 PM
โ05-07-2015 07:42 PM - edited โ05-07-2015 07:42 PM
Sheesh.... talk about judging a book by its cover..
...................A tattoo is personal. It doesnt affect anyone else. If it bothers you, then its you who has the problem!
im giving an opinion here, women with tatts don't 'look' appealling to me
and if my opinion offends..its a problem of [yours] theirs...not mine
on โ05-07-2015 09:19 PM
on โ05-07-2015 09:38 PM
In regard to tattoos
My mother gave me some good advice years ago.
She said - get anything printed on a t-shirt that appeals to you.
Wear the t-shirt 24/7 for a year and see how long it takes for you to get bored with it.
Keep buying the same t-shirt for years and years and years and years.
Or have a picture framed and hang it in a prominant place in the home (any picture that you like)
Then and only then, decide whether or not to go ahead with putting ink into your own skin.
Most of the time, the person wearing the tattoo is not looking at it. But whoever is looking at the tattoo
all the time is probably not all that impressed.
.......... For once in my life - I agree completely with Monman ..........
I think skin is beautiful.
I like to look into someones eyes, and tattoos somehow detract from that.
Either way - each to their own. As long as they are not on me.
on โ05-07-2015 09:47 PM
@donnashuggy wrote:You talking to me Joz?
lol, reminds me of that movie scene in taxi driver
surely by now you must recognize when quoting somebody in italics, donna?!
on โ12-07-2015 09:53 AM
@onau702 wrote:Sure, i guess. I mean if I like the artwork, the picture or design, yeah, I'd like the tattoo. Just so long as it's not on the breasts or bum, those things look good enough already and I see no reason to cover them up.
two of my tattoos are on my butt yet small so they hardly 'cover up' my butt
on โ12-07-2015 10:00 AM
@*pepe wrote:
@lionrose.7 wrote:Pepe me too, I got mine for a special reason and I was not young when I got them.
My children laughed and thought it was funny.
I certainly dont feel degraded in any way.
i was 40 when i got mine.
i was 40 as well & never looked back other than to admire my art where it is inked
โ12-07-2015 10:09 AM - edited โ12-07-2015 10:10 AM
@lionrose.7 wrote:Icey get a Tatt ๐ get one where you have a bit of fatty tissue, does not hurt as much, dont get one on a bony place.
It was just like some one running a nail over your skin, but then I have a high Pain threshold.
my first tattoo(s) on my butt, the devil's pitchfork on the very inner side of the right butt & a devil tail on the very inner of my left butt, i say very inner butt because i had to go back for the artist to go deeper into my butt so when my butt closed, the tail actually went all the way into my butt
my other/third tattoo is my native Ukraine Coat of Arms in the centre of the back's sacral bone .....but that tattoo did hurt more than the devil