on โ02-02-2014 05:56 PM
New York (AFP) - The adopted daughter of Woody Allen has spoken for the first time about the alleged sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of the legendary Hollywood director during her childhood.
In an open letter published on a New York Times blog, Dylan Farrow, adopted by Allen during his relationship with actress Mia Farrow, detailed being abused by the director when she was seven years old.
"He told me to lay on my stomach and play with my brother's electric train set. Then he sexually assaulted me," Farrow, 28, wrote in the letter.
"He talked to me while he did it, whispering that I was a good girl, that this was our secret, promising that we'd go to Paris and I'd be a star in his movies."
It is the first time Dylan Farrow has spoken publicly about the unproven allegations of abuse which emerged more than two decades ago in the aftermath of Allen's acrimonious split with Mia Farrow in 1992.
Allen, who left Mia Farrow after starting a relationship with the actress's adopted daughter from a previous marriage, Soon-Yi Previn, has always vigorously denied abusing Dylan Farrow.
A New York judge in the 1994 custody battle between Allen and Farrow ruled that the abuse allegations were inconclusive, while at the same time lambasted the director as "self-absorbed, untrustworthy and insensitive."
Allen's representatives could not be immediately reached for comment on Saturday after Dylan Farrow's revelations. The New York Times reported that he had refused to comment.
His adopted daughter accused the Hollywood establishment of sweeping Allen's alleged crimes under the carpet by continuing to honor his films.
Dylan with her mother Mia Farrow in 1990, two years before the alleged incident. Photo: Getty
The director's latest movie, "Blue Jasmine", is nominated for three Academy Awards at next month's Oscars, including best original screenplay for the director.
Farrow called on three of the stars of "Blue Jasmine" -- Australian actress Cate Blanchett, Alec Baldwin and Louis C.K. to examine their relationship with Allen, asking pointedly: "What if it had been your child?"
"Woody Allen was never convicted of any crime. That he got away with what he did to me haunted me as I grew up," she wrote.
"That torment was made worse by Hollywood. All but a precious few (my heroes) turned a blind eye. Most found it easier to accept the ambiguity, to say, 'who can say what happened,' to pretend that nothing was wrong.
"Actors praised him at awards shows. Networks put him on TV. Critics put him in magazines.
"Woody Allen is a living testament to the way our society fails the survivors of sexual assault and abuse."
โ02-02-2014 06:47 PM - edited โ02-02-2014 06:48 PM
Then if there is nothing she can do, she should be careful he does not take action for unsubstantiated allegations, as awful as that would be, if true.
if a legal avenue exists, she should take it.
on โ02-02-2014 06:49 PM
If he takes civil action, she gets her day in court.
on โ02-02-2014 06:52 PM
I thought of that.
But it might not be when she is ready..if you see what I mean.
on โ02-02-2014 06:54 PM
@amber-eyed-girl wrote:I thought of that.
But it might not be when she is ready..if you see what I mean.
I think she is ready now, hence the blog.
on โ02-02-2014 06:56 PM
on โ02-02-2014 07:01 PM
@amber-eyed-girl wrote:
It is different to tell your story on a blog, with no need to defend it, or provide evidence...it is a form of emotional release.
Court is a draining nightmare for sexual assault victims.
She needs to be strong enough for that.
She kind of went through it already with the custody battle when they split though.
Look, I don't know anymore than you do if the accusations are true. But if she feels the need to do this now, maybe to get some closure or peace, good for her.
โ02-02-2014 09:42 PM - edited โ02-02-2014 09:44 PM
@nevynreally wrote:
@azureline** wrote:They have a new name for that now, it's called "historical abuse" and is very hard to prove so long after the event.
I don't think so in this case, as the claims were initially made 20 years ago and deemed "inconclusive" by the judge.
Imagine yourself on a jury............... and the Judge says "in your deliberations, bear in mind, it is not your position to determine who is telling the truth.
In the absence of any actual evidence, be it DNA or admissions or even eye witnesses, you have the job of determining beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is either innocent or guilty based on actual evidence. Nothing more"
and what is the Judge saying there?
on โ02-02-2014 09:50 PM
If Allen took action in the civil courts then it is no longer beyond reasonable doubt but more on the balance of probability so Allen would have to be very, very careful if he took civil action.
โ02-02-2014 10:08 PM - edited โ02-02-2014 10:09 PM
@azureline** wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:
@azureline** wrote:They have a new name for that now, it's called "historical abuse" and is very hard to prove so long after the event.
I don't think so in this case, as the claims were initially made 20 years ago and deemed "inconclusive" by the judge.
Imagine yourself on a jury............... and the Judge says "in your deliberations, bear in mind, it is not your position to determine who is telling the truth.
In the absence of any actual evidence, be it DNA or admissions or even eye witnesses, you have the job of determining beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is either innocent or guilty based on actual evidence. Nothing more"
and what is the Judge saying there?
I don't understand your post in relation to this thread. I never said the judge in the custody case was wrong or right. Only mentioned there was a previous trial about this, and while the statute of limitations doesn't allow in NY allow for criminal proceedings to go ahead, civil ones could.
on โ02-02-2014 10:49 PM
my post is in relation to the possibility of a trial. No evidence other than hearsay.