"Is Paying for Secks Morally Wrong"

[the_bob_delusion]

Argue for or Against.

[cherry*135]

Are you taking into account whether the person paying is single, free, available or whether they have a current partner?

I thought DEBS comment, was witty aps. 😉

[icyfroth]

---

@am*3 wrote:
Are you taking into account whether the person paying is single, free, available or whether they have a current partner?

I thought DEBS comment, was witty aps. 😉

---

hope you didn't fall off your chair again.

[gleee58]

What are secks?

Are they sex sacks?

[cherry*135]

I did, icy - ouch, need a lie down now.

Secks, sox, etc is a hangover from when sex was a prohibited word on CS (filter)

Couldn't post Dick Smith either at one stage, Dick used to get bleeped.

[lionrose.7]

Can you say **bleep** cat here yet

[bluecat*dancing]

No, you can't.

[cherry*135]

Testing - **bleep**nic

Nup... A r s e n i c chemical element.

[this-one-time-at-bandcamp]

Now that is a cheapskate new hubby.

When gold was $32 an ounce in 1964?  That wedding band would have weighed almost 2 ounces..........how much does yours weigh?

[cmcoins2000]

---

@this-one-time-at-bandcamp wrote:

Now that is a cheapskate new hubby.

When gold was $32 an ounce in 1964?  That wedding band would have weighed almost 2 ounces..........how much does yours weigh?

---

I can't even do the dishes in mine.

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

A massive finger would require a 2 ounce wedding ring......giggle.