on โ04-01-2015 11:01 AM
on โ04-01-2015 11:18 AM
***holds back*****
Push a shopping trolley this morning?
DEB
on โ04-01-2015 11:20 AM
@*julia*2010 wrote:wth is secks?
why cant you just say sex ??
Do you think he is a New Zealander??
on โ04-01-2015 11:21 AM
@this-one-time-at-bandcamp wrote:Every body pays...............I remember oh, so many years ago, a bunch of early teens were loafing on the lawn, talking about this very subject. One girl, a good Catholic, stated emphatically that she, "Wouldn't do it for a million dollars"...........
I pointed out to her that she will be doing it for a whole lot less in a few years, in fact it would only take a $50 wedding band.
Used to be a milkshake and a movie.
on โ04-01-2015 11:22 AM
lol maybe.
dont they know how to spell either?
โ04-01-2015 11:24 AM - edited โ04-01-2015 11:25 AM
on โ04-01-2015 11:27 AM
@*julia*2010 wrote:lol maybe.
dont they know how to spell either?
Just different J.
on โ04-01-2015 11:32 AM
on โ04-01-2015 11:38 AM
@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:
@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:Argue for or Against.
Ha ha! At first, I thought the thread said 'socks!'
Yes paying for socks is evil.
on โ04-01-2015 11:43 AM
on โ04-01-2015 01:33 PM
@channys_mum wrote:Sax has always been paid for one way or another
You got that right. When the bird of paradox was head of the Australian Union of Students (AUS) she saw to it that the AUS adopt the catchcry of the vaginaocracy "Prostitution takes many forms and is not only the exchange of money for sex โฆ Prostitution in marriage is the transaction of sex in return for love, security and housekeepingโ. A few days later students upset with the AUS carried placards reading "The AUS says your mother is a prostitute".
I think paying for sex is OK. Consider the man or woman in a loveless marriage. He or she needs something their partner isn't supplying.