on 11-03-2014 04:19 PM
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says SPC Ardmona's $70 million deal to supply Woolworths with Australian-grown canned fruit shows the company never needed taxpayer assistance from the Federal Government.
umm tone, the money that saved SPC is taxpayer money.. it comes from the state government coffers.. probably a suggestion from yourself in order to save face if they were to pull out ..
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-11/spc-ardmona-signs-70m-deal-with-woolworths/5311496
on 11-03-2014 05:44 PM
@newstart2380 wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:Prime Minister Tony Abbott says SPC Ardmona's $70 million deal to supply Woolworths with Australian-grown canned fruit shows the company never needed taxpayer assistance from the Federal Government.
umm tone, the money that saved SPC is taxpayer money.. it comes from the state government coffers.. probably a suggestion from yourself in order to save face if they were to pull out ..
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-11/spc-ardmona-signs-70m-deal-with-woolworths/5311496
I am so sick of your negative B S, get over it labor lost the election and we now have a government which will get us back in the black (not a racist statement) so we do have money to spend on the necessities such as much needed infastructure in all states.
oh dear, maybe stop looking at the threads that aren't all about how wonderful the govt is, quite easy really.
on 11-03-2014 05:52 PM
@freddie*rooster wrote:so we do have money to spend on the necessities such as much needed infastructure in all states.
All this at the expense of lost jobs, and loss of pensions for the less fortunate.
yes and coupled with the lies about the "budget emergency", the "entitled" idle rich getting richer at our expense and a general ignorance of economics and there you have it.
on 11-03-2014 06:35 PM
on 11-03-2014 09:05 PM
No jobs = no consumers = no economy
on 11-03-2014 09:39 PM
@boris1gary wrote:
Remember 1999 B1G?. When SPC workers told the union to get stuffed, and then voluntarily arranged a reduction in working conditions in order to save the company/their jobs? They achieved both, even though an intransigent union declared their actions "illegal", whatever blind ideological nonsense that meant.
Remember 2014 B1G? when a union obtained a court injunction to prevent Toyota workers having a say in their future, whatever blind ideological nonsense that meant, and now the workers future: none now.
Some friends a union can be!
nɥºɾ