on 29-07-2013 12:50 PM
Hello,
I know this topic has been done to death. I also recognise that the changes that eBay implemented some years ago
were for the (retaliatory) negative feedback option was removed as an option to sellers.
But what is the current system about?
Percentages in negative feedback affect all the sellers adversely, so if the current system is democratic and fair
why is the seller that looses out, not only in percentages, reputation, but also in honesty? Meaning, the only option that the seller has is to reply to the negative feedback.
Where is the honesty in that? How is it fair in any way?
Here is one of the examples:
29-07-2013 01:23 PM - edited 29-07-2013 01:24 PM
According to this article in ecommerce bytes there may be help on the way - http://www.ecommercebytes.com/cab/abn/y13/m07/i23/s01 -
This year, eBay is expanding its Feedback Removal policy across all of its international sites - including the U.S. Here are some of the new situations in which sellers can request eBay remove qualifying low ratings and feedback.
on 29-07-2013 03:37 PM
Thanks, it does look positive, although I don't fully understand this:
Feedback refers to information the seller entered in the structured listing fields (item specifics, sales tax, returns policy, combined postage, accepted payments) and there is no contradictory information elsewhere in the listing.
Example: If the buyer's feedback states: Item not as described, not new with tags, or incorrect size
Is that in it self enough to have the feedback removed considering that you have provided correct information in your listing:
Size, colour, condition etc...
Thanks
on 29-07-2013 04:58 PM
@themobelista wrote:Thanks, it does look positive, although I don't fully understand this:
Feedback refers to information the seller entered in the structured listing fields (item specifics, sales tax, returns policy, combined postage, accepted payments) and there is no contradictory information elsewhere in the listing.
That, as far as I know, refers to complaints in feedback about issues that were detailed clearly in the listing. For example, say the seller has a 'no returns' policy and a neg is left because the seller would not accept a return on an item that the buyer decided they didn't want. So, the complaint has to be about something that was mentioned - if the listing states New with tags, and the complaint is that it wasn't new with tags, it wouldn't qualify for removal as eBay wouldn't know if the buyer received the item as it was described. If the listing stated that an item was new with defects and the complaint was that the item had defects, it would probably qualify for removal.
Quite often, negs are removed if the details are in the description, not just the structured fields - a common one relates to the size of items and "smaller than I thought" comments (if photographs of the item next to a ruler, and/or exact measurements were in the listing, negs will usually be removed), or if the seller states clearly an item comes from a smoking household and the buyer's FB is complaining the items smell of smoke.
on 29-07-2013 06:07 PM
Thanks dg, I find your posts very informative and well written.
29-07-2013 06:25 PM - edited 29-07-2013 06:26 PM
No problem 🙂 When it is a case of the buyer's word against the seller's, the buyer's will typically be taken for granted. From the seller's perspective that can seem grossly unfair, but from ebay's perspective, and in the absence of them being willing to provide a proper mediation process where a third party decides on an outcome based on all provided evidence, taking the buyer's word for it becomes the simplest, and probably most economical, thing to do - keeping buyers happy and returning to the site is more beneficial to eBay than keeping a seller happy, who will generally continue to list and sell items despite an unfair FB, whereas a buyer who becomes upset over the FB process may not ever come back.
However, there are still options available to a selller if eBay can't see clearly whether the buyer's feedback is truthful, namely applying for removal on the grounds of defamation. It involves a bit of legwork (getting a statement witnessed and submitting it to eBay), but worth it to get an unfair neg or comment removed.
on 29-07-2013 06:29 PM
A lot of buyers are causing trouble simply because they can!
Obviously you have a completely different clientele than i do, in well over a decade of selling clothes, new and used, I have only had one buyer leave me negs (Nobody mention the c word ) which were removed soon after when the buyer was de registered for a string of scams.
on 29-07-2013 07:51 PM
I don't quite understand what you mean by different clientele, could you please explain?
The feedback example provided above was found by accident and it is not my own.
My own customers are so far very happy with the items and service provided, so no problems there
on 29-07-2013 08:23 PM
I was impressed by this dot point (if I'm reading it correctly):
A buyer left low ratings or negative feedback but provided clearly positive comments
I assume by 'low ratings' it means dsrs and therefore something might be done about the buyers that give positive feedback but leave 1s or 2s