on โ17-12-2014 08:51 PM
on โ17-12-2014 11:56 PM
OP said #5 "Measurements were stated in a picture on the listing" If those measurements were incorrect then the buyer does have a case.
on โ18-12-2014 10:15 AM
Ebay won't do anything about emails sent directly to you and why you let them bother you I have no idea. If you send them one email telling them not to contact you again and they send another you can report them to theor isp for abuse.
Personally I would just delete them without reading then they are only wasting theor own time, not yours.
on โ18-12-2014 03:48 PM
http://pages.ebay.com.au/help/feedback/respond.html
Leave an honest and factual follow up comment under your negative.
on โ18-12-2014 04:13 PM
Please don't keep replying to him. Just ignore it. It will only antagonize him.
I'd take it as an interesting challenge to my language skills to antagonise the sender into an incandescent rage without actuaslly being at all crude or abusive.
on โ18-12-2014 04:18 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:OP said #5 "Measurements were stated in a picture on the listing" If those measurements were incorrect then the buyer does have a case.
Actually no, this still comes under "item doesn't fit". This is not a basis for SNAD and the seller could challenge a SNAD if one were raised.
Return reason | Who pays for return postage |
Does not fit | As stated in sellerโs return policy |
No longer want/need | As stated in sellerโs return policy |
Found better price | As stated in sellerโs return policy |
Defective/Does not work | Seller |
Item differs from listing | Seller |
Missing parts or accessories | Seller |
Arrived damaged | Seller |
Fake or counterfeit | Seller |
on โ18-12-2014 04:19 PM
@afantiques wrote:Please don't keep replying to him. Just ignore it. It will only antagonize him.
I'd take it as an interesting challenge to my language skills to antagonise the sender into an incandescent rage without actuaslly being at all crude or abusive.
on โ18-12-2014 05:01 PM
@black*poppy wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:OP said #5 "Measurements were stated in a picture on the listing" If those measurements were incorrect then the buyer does have a case.
Actually no, this still comes under "item doesn't fit". This is not a basis for SNAD and the seller could challenge a SNAD if one were raised.
Return reason Who pays for return postage Does not fit As stated in sellerโs return policy No longer want/need As stated in sellerโs return policy Found better price As stated in sellerโs return policy Defective/Does not work Seller Item differs from listing Seller Missing parts or accessories Seller Arrived damaged Seller Fake or counterfeit Seller
How about "item differs from listing." If the measurements were incorrect, that would seem to be a fair description.
on โ18-12-2014 05:04 PM
Does not fit does not mean the seller can give incorrect measurements and then expect to use the does not fit defense, it would be a clear case of item differs from listing which means the seller does pay. If no measurements were given or the measurements were correct then it would be dependant on the seller's policy.
on โ18-12-2014 08:15 PM
Why would a seller give incorrect measurements???
It's not the same as trying to hide a flaw, stain etc.
You can have opinions but I was able to successfully argue this and I would encourage other clothes sellers to do so too.
โ18-12-2014 08:58 PM - edited โ18-12-2014 08:59 PM
@black*poppy wrote:Why would a seller give incorrect measurements???
I'd say very few would, if any.....intentionally, anyway.
I have provided both incorrect measurements and sizing recommendations in my listings before, though, each time most definitely unintentionally, but this would = INAD, in my own eyes if no one else's. (Once, I copy/pasted the measurements to a different item into the description, and more recently I discovered one of my bracelet sizing recommendations were off by around 2cm, which is quite significant for a bracelet and resulted in a buyer receiving one that didn't fit - I extended it at no cost, plus paid for postage both ways).