on โ23-04-2014 02:59 PM
on โ25-04-2014 01:35 PM
on โ25-04-2014 05:31 PM
on โ25-04-2014 05:58 PM
Why would one think to even question the postage if it clearly says Parcel Post satchel etc etc in the listing? That in itself tells me item is a parcel shape, heck possibly even boxed, and that it is travelling via a tracked method. Sounds reasonable enough. And I'd be expecting a red Australia Post satchel to arrive. That part of the purchase did not arrive.
Instead 'flat' item arrives in plain paper envelope, 2 or 3 stamps stuck on and what do you know? NO tracking.
Are people here just so used to sellers doing this kind of thing they become immune to it and think buyers should just suck it up?
on โ25-04-2014 06:01 PM
The point is that tracking is irrlevant, as is the packaging, as the OP got their goods in good condition, presumably in a timely manner. Tracking and packaging really only count when things go agley, which didn't happen in this case.
on โ27-04-2014 09:15 AM
on โ27-04-2014 09:16 AM
โ27-04-2014 12:51 PM - edited โ27-04-2014 12:53 PM
@chezzy wrote:Why would one think to even question the postage if it clearly says Parcel Post satchel etc etc in the listing? That in itself tells me item is a parcel shape, heck possibly even boxed, and that it is travelling via a tracked method. Sounds reasonable enough. And I'd be expecting a red Australia Post satchel to arrive. That part of the purchase did not arrive.
Instead 'flat' item arrives in plain paper envelope, 2 or 3 stamps stuck on and what do you know? NO tracking.
Are people here just so used to sellers doing this kind of thing they become immune to it and think buyers should just suck it up?
I had a recent one where I paid $9 for parcel post and the garment was sent in an envelope with $1.20 of stamps on it - to collect it I had to pay the underpaid post - as of course the seller did not put a return address on it.
The seller did reimburse me for the post I had to pay on request when I sent through a photo of the envelope with the large underpaid post sticker on it.
Had the envelope managed to get through Aust Posts processes as a large letter - I still would have pursued the seller for post overpaid - when I pay for a regular satchel, I expect to get a regular satchel and I will seek compensation from a seller, each and every time.
Buyers should never be expected to just cop this type of poor seller behaviour. It does nothing to contribute to buyer confidence.
on โ27-04-2014 01:46 PM
โ27-04-2014 01:54 PM - edited โ27-04-2014 01:56 PM
on โ27-04-2014 04:09 PM
What you can charge | Actual postage cost: This is the amount for posting the item. It should be what you paid the carrier. Also be consistent with eBay policies for the postage charges for the category you are listing in. Handling cost: This can include the cost of packaging materials Delivery confirmation and extra services: If these options are offered to the buyer, you can only charge what they actually cost. |