on 11-06-2020 07:13 PM
Remember a few weeks back there was a certain buyer who purchased an item from the USA and then started harassing the seller for a refund because it was either lost, never sent, or stolen, despite tracking evidence to the contrary?
That item showed up in Sydney today.
on 12-06-2020 03:46 PM
on 12-06-2020 06:48 PM
> Yes, this left Miami on 11 April, and yesterday was 11 June, so two months exactly from USA to AUS
Where are you getting this information though? The tracking for my CD still says it is sitting in Miami even though it was delivered yesterday, and the OP's tracking shows Miami also. I'm using the USPS.com website.
12-06-2020 07:09 PM - edited 12-06-2020 07:10 PM
AP tracking.
I am the OP.
on 12-06-2020 07:17 PM
I meant the OP of the original thread.
Just checked their tracking on the Aust Post website and it is indeed in Sydney. Their tracking had a prefix of LZ.
My CD had a prefix of UA which is not recognised on the Aust Post website.
on 12-06-2020 08:09 PM
on 12-06-2020 08:27 PM
>Thank you for confirming that I can indeed read.
Ouch.
on 12-06-2020 11:56 PM
@tazzieterror wrote:
@austfox wrote:...
Just checked their tracking on the Aust Post website and it is indeed in Sydney
....
Thank you for confirming that I can indeed read.
Tongue firmly in cheek Tazzie?
13-06-2020 12:35 AM - edited 13-06-2020 12:35 AM
@audio-spot wrote:>Thank you for confirming that I can indeed read.
Ouch.
You're right - that came across as harsh - it wasn't intended that way, and I apologise.
Supposedly the UA prefix indicates a letter post item that's not traced - once it leaves the USA it's off the system. The LZ (and other L-something prefixes) do have tracing because they're classified as parcels instead of letters (I think). It would seem to make sense as your CD is flat while the item was something thicker.
on 17-06-2020 01:51 PM
Another update: the item is onboard for delivery today.
on 17-06-2020 07:19 PM