I understand what you are saying but I disagree. Firstly, I'm not convinced about the semantics, but more than that, Atheism as the belief that there is no God also has repercussions for basic beliefs about the inherent dignity/worth of a person. This has direct influence on what is believe to be licit to do with and to people. Simply put, the atheism of Marx (and antitheism of Communism which I'm not convinced can be entirely separated from atheism in my personal opnion!) had a massive influence on the atrocities perpetuated by Communist regime, atrocities that continue today.
|
Doesn't then make it about how people uphold and act upon their beliefs, rather than the belief (or lack thereof) itself? I understand that collectively, any '-ism' has the potential to influence society and behaviour en masse, but atheism doesn't really have a movement for people to follow, there are no doctrines, there's no propaganda, there's not even anything that particularly encourages others to not believe - to me, at least, it seems very much an individual thing and those individuals rarely - if ever - actively seek to change other people's belief system - they will defend and / or explain why they don't believe, and it's true that some people will look down on others for what they believe, but that's part of the person's attitude to their fellow human beings rather than a direct result of not believing in the same thing. If you look at organised religion, though, damning those who do not believe is part of the movement, same too for antitheism - damning those who do believe, which is the key difference to me.
Atheism and antitheism are not polar opposites, that is true, and as non belief in any particular religion is likely at the core of antitheist movements, I would not suggest that they can be completely separated, but IMO semantics in this instance are important, because one can absolutely be atheist without being antitheist, and it's antitheism that seeks to oppose.
