@goprosuper3 wrote:
I meant he charged $18 for postage when it normally should've been $12.26-$13 as you mentioned. He sent it via Aus Post.
That DOES mean he inflated the postage prices.
That's debateable, really. I know for some it comes down to a matter of semantics, but there being costs associated with postage other than stamp price and adding that to postage charges is technically not inflating, it's including.
Unless there's something I'm missing, until (or if, I suppose), you receive the package, and can see what service(s) were used, you probably can't say for sure that it was "inflated", unless you consider all postage amounts above and beyond stamp prices to be inflated, I guess (it's obviously possible the P&H was padded a little, sellers who start auctions that low will often ensure they at least don't make a loss).
