5G phone network: Expert concerned by lack of understanding of potential health effects
here is an expert on the dangers of the 5G network.
@4channel wrote:
I just went back and read some of the comments on the YT page jetho posted the link to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TiOx7_DVj0
The first comment above seems quitte passionate. The reply is understandable.
Marney Cohen
2 months ago
From a Tech named Ian:
The radio frequency that our towers currently emit is non ionizing radiation with a long footprint over the ground, so it is able to dissipate and spread out.
It is currently being broadcast anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5 /2.8 megahertz [MHz]
The symbol for megahertz is MHz. The base unit for a megahertz is the hertz and the prefix is mega.
The prefix mega is derived from the Greek megas meaning great is is symbolized as M. Mega denotes a factor of a million (10 6) which means that there are 1,000,000 hertz in a megahertz.
If you take the radio frequency close it super heats the water molecules in your brain, eyes and testicles. You can become sterile. It’s a very real and can make people have splitting headaches for days. This is coming from someone who climbs towers and he said he cooked the top of his scull and that was short range at a relatively low power and left him useless for the rest of the day.
The way 5G is going to work is it is going to broadcast in gigahertz [1 GHz = 1000 MHz] For example they are estimating around 30+ GHz and that will be 15,000 times stronger to what is being pushed out now. This is going to go at a much steeper peek, it going to be broadcast straight to the ground and going to hit more receivers and then transmit outwards.
The plan is to install these small cells on billboards, streetlights, sides of buildings, corners of offices, hallways of apartment complexes so that they can get lighting fast speeds.
Here is the concern the RF’s that have been broadcasting isn’t really damaging to us though we can’t tell the long term effects but because it dissipates over distance and its not a concentrated thing that the RF that’s being broadcast now has a really long wave trough so even when your hit with it your not absorbing a lot. The workers who work close range eat it but you don’t feel it down off the tower.
It’s not going to be that way with 5G, its going be in the corner of your office [they are talking about putting a 38 band Monoband antenna]in the back of every car so they can talk to each other and self drive.
5G its wave form is much tighter 4g, 3g, 2g have fairly long wave troughs to reach distances from the towers. 5g is going to be broadcast in millimeter waves with closer wave troughs so when it hits we are going to get blasted. So instead of coming from towers that takes longer a longer time to reach, it will be much closer coming from the corners of offices, etc.
This will directly effect the cellular membranes of people, the bonds that hold your cells together, its going to be right in your face, its going to be behind your seat in your car not to mention what its going to do to our brains, eyes, or any other part of our bodies. There will be super heating that RF will be giving off at such close range but because it is so powerful, so compact and tightly beamed it will actually break down the bonds that hold your cells together and that is how you get tumors.
Its too late people have trillions of dollars tied up in this 5G technology just so everyone can scroll at the speed of light. Nobody cares not even the techs that install this technology they do it for the money, they can’t stop it either when our leaders sign bills to go ahead, Trump just signed the 5G bill March 23, 2020. Pregnant women and their fetus will be harmed with this technology. All of us will be harmed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TiOx7_DVj0
The one above is quite scarey.
The point is that computers can " scroll at the speed of light " , 5G will enable universal people support efficiently controlled by computers , i suppose 1 virtual computer for each person in pro-active support , an alter ego , shadow buddy , super robo-mate
@4channel wrote:
Anyone who believes fluoride is safe is either a fool or someone who has been fooled. Many things on the official level backed up by so called science have been presented in a way to protect the agenda that is at hand.
So you missed the part that Aus uses much lower levels so you need to find links for Aus and not the rest of
the wold as you normally do.
Experts have determined that fluoride should be present in a recommended range of 0.6 to 1.1 mg/L for optimal dental health outcomes. The amount of fluoride added depends on the fluoride levels that naturally occur in a given water supply and average temperatures in the region. In some regions of Australia, fluoride already naturally occurs in this recommended range. However, 89 per cent of Australia does add extra fluoride to drinking water to boost the level into that recommended range. It’s a practice that has been occurring for decades, with the added fluoride identical to any naturally occurring fluoride ions.
A small number of studies that do point to health problems are from places with fluoridation levels up to five times greater than Australia. They’re also generally low-quality studies that fail to control for confounding factors. For example, a recent observational study linked fluoride intake during pregnancy to lower IQ of boys, but not girls. In addition to this unexplained sex-specific finding, this study does not show cause-and-effect and critics have questioned the statistical methods used. More robust research is needed; but for now, the NHMRC has collated the best evidence we have in their systematic review and not found any reliable links.
The day I would believe that everything that supports a government's agenda with supposed scientific fact is the day I'll believe that the earth is flat.
In America many people believe that corruption has seeped into the FDA. Do I think that's the case?? Well IMO it's either a an incompetent organisation at some levels, or the suspicions of Americans have foundation.
The US has people paranoid about every part of the Government and will find someone that supports that.
Having a complete belief that everything told to you is safe being true and you do so at your own peril
Having a complete belief that everything told to you is false can be damaging to you health.
@go-tazz wrote:
@4channel wrote:Anyone who believes fluoride is safe is either a fool or someone who has been fooled. Many things on the official level backed up by so called science have been presented in a way to protect the agenda that is at hand.
So you missed the part that Aus uses much lower levels so you need to find links for Aus and not the rest of
the wold as you normally do.
Experts have determined that fluoride should be present in a recommended range of 0.6 to 1.1 mg/L for optimal dental health outcomes. The amount of fluoride added depends on the fluoride levels that naturally occur in a given water supply and average temperatures in the region. In some regions of Australia, fluoride already naturally occurs in this recommended range. However, 89 per cent of Australia does add extra fluoride to drinking water to boost the level into that recommended range. It’s a practice that has been occurring for decades, with the added fluoride identical to any naturally occurring fluoride ions.
A small number of studies that do point to health problems are from places with fluoridation levels up to five times greater than Australia. They’re also generally low-quality studies that fail to control for confounding factors. For example, a recent observational study linked fluoride intake during pregnancy to lower IQ of boys, but not girls. In addition to this unexplained sex-specific finding, this study does not show cause-and-effect and critics have questioned the statistical methods used. More robust research is needed; but for now, the NHMRC has collated the best evidence we have in their systematic review and not found any reliable links.
The day I would believe that everything that supports a government's agenda with supposed scientific fact is the day I'll believe that the earth is flat.
In America many people believe that corruption has seeped into the FDA. Do I think that's the case?? Well IMO it's either a an incompetent organisation at some levels, or the suspicions of Americans have foundation.
The US has people paranoid about every part of the Government and will find someone that supports that.
Having a complete belief that everything told to you is safe being true and you do so at your own peril
Having a complete belief that everything told to you is false can be damaging to you health.
Go with the flow
