Yes, the tests to see the harmful side of vaccines fall way short of what a proper test should be. Well, I don't know how many vaccinations a baby gets these days at once or in within a short period of time but I'd say that it is way too many for their little developing systems to deal with. What doesn't affect them in the short term may be a problem later in life.
I'm not a believer in multiple vaccines within a short period of time on a tiny, young and fragile person.. I do accept that some may be necessary but not a bloody barrage and assault on that tiny human being, no way! Yes, "Over-doses from clumsy administration" is indeed a major concern. The problem is that we are looking at a profit-driven agenda. Doctors sign papers, inject because they are told to do so and many do without thinking of the consequences. How often we hear of people who have been a victim of unnecessary medication by their doctors and for years their health has been compromised. Then they at the intervention of family or other concerned parties find another doctor who uncovers a whole mess or medication that this person has been subjected to!
I would prefer little babies and toddlers not be subjected to all of this in the first place so they don't get poisoned with heavy metals and require some kind of cleansing. They say that mercury and aluminium is in the vaccines as a booster and a preservative. Surely there's got to be a better way?
As I said, I accept that some vaccines would be necessary but not the multitude that we see today. And the third world countries where the oral vaccine has been squirted in like you describe, it's a frightening picture!
Now babies will be born into a world where they not only are at risk of being of being damaged by the metals in vaccines, they will have to deal with chemicals in food, GM and exposure to EMF from mobile phone towers etc., with 5G being the latest concern.
The 1950s, 1960s, 1970s and even 1980s were a safer, healthiier time to grow up.
