on 04-05-2014 04:43 PM
This week more than any other really demonstrates that conservative values (whatever they may be) are definitely on the nose with the electorate . it's hard to think of anyone who actually likes the tripe they are proposing (well apart from the rather sad usuals who'd clap anything they did )
i think its going to be a short stay.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 04-05-2014 06:09 PM
on 04-05-2014 07:52 PM
on 04-05-2014 08:02 PM
Maybe he does not know what hesitate means? There are lots of basic word our PM doesn't understand:
on 04-05-2014 08:03 PM
on 04-05-2014 08:30 PM
on 05-05-2014 10:37 AM
The band-aid levy: a new tax won’t fix the structural budget problems.
see comments:
...." It isn’t that they want to get the budget back into surplus it is that their (libs in now) policies are confused and contradictory and the burden falls harder on those who can least afford it..."
...."I am happy to pay a little more tax if we get free access to health and top class education but to try to slash and burn simply to pay for direct action, a rolls royce PPL scheme and so big miners can pay less tax is not what I call a good idea..."
...." Abbott school of logic which posits a statement along the lines of everything Labor did was bad and we have to clean up this huge mess without giving a skerrick of evidence that there is a huge mess to clean up.
The fact that under labor we were one of the few advanced economies that didn’t go into recession during the GFC and the fact that our government debt levels are low are meaning less to people like this.
3 word slogans are about all they can comprehend which is why Tony appeals to them perfectly."
on 05-05-2014 11:09 AM
Ever heard of that old line about surgeons: "The operation was a success, but the patient died"?....
....We're a nation, not a balance sheet
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-02/earls-were-a-nation-not-a-balance-sheet/5426014
Australia is a nation full of humans, not a balance sheet. The Commission of Audit may have looked at the numbers but the Government needs to look after the people, writes Nick Earls.
According to Commission of Audit chairman Tony Shepherd, "We've answered a simple arithmetic equation". Maybe that's where the problem starts.
Ever heard of that old line about surgeons: "The operation was a success, but the patient died"?
A nation is not a balance sheet. Perhaps the Commission was asked to treat it as one, but there are 23 million humans here too, and I don't see much space allowed for them in the Commission's report. A neat set of figures a decade from now would be no compensation for serious negative social consequences.
The report seems to take a sideways look at America, a country that shows us the best and worst of capitalism, and cherrypicks the worst bits. It radically slashes the minimum wage, decreases a whole range of benefits connected to things like health and education, and imposes costs on people who can't afford to pay.
In too many ways, it looks like How to Create a Permanent Underclass 101.
It turns cooperative federalism into competitive federalism, something else that, in the US, has widened the opportunity gap between children born in rich states and those born in poor states.
Am I saying we should do nothing? No. We need to better align our spending and our tax base, but to do it we need a system that reflects who we are now as a nation and who we will be.
When the pension age was set at 65, that was close to the average lifespan. We now live far longer, are healthier for far longer and many jobs are less physical. I'm happy to work until I'm 70, if I'm able to. Actually, I'm happy to keep writing as long as people keep buying my books.
I want to grow up to be Tom Keneally or David Malouf, still in the game, relevant, putting out quality work and paying tax aged 78 and 80.
The Commission of Audit isn't the only group releasing a report this week. Anglicare's snapshot of rental affordability was taken on April 5. It found 62,000 properties available for rent that day. Single people on benefits could afford 1 per cent of them, single people on the current minimum wage could afford 4 per cent and age pensioners could afford 3.6 per cent. Welfare agencies say people are already eating less to pay rent.
This is a crisis involving people, not an arithmetic equation, and several of the Commission's recommendations would make it quickly worse.
I'm hoping the commission process is at least 50 per cent politics. (That we deserve better politics is a subject for another day, or indeed most other days.) The playbook goes like this:
Step 1: You go into an election saying there's a financial crisis, but promising not to cut anything that'll cost you votes.
Step 2: You win the election and set up an independent commission of audit run by people certain to tell you what you want to hear. (See how that word independent just slipped in there? The Government isn't coming up with this stuff, it's those independent people. It's been several years since any of them was on a Coalition front bench.)
Step 3: The independent commission discovers there's a crisis, but this isn't the lower-case pre-election crisis. It's now been revealed to be a sixteen-point, bold, italicised, capital letter CRISIS. We've moved from "don't frighten the horses" to "unless we face up to this, we could all be eating the horses". This crisis calls for drastic action.
Step 4: But not that drastic. Thanks very much, independent commission, but here comes the budget. Is it possible that, behind the scenes, Joe Hockey has been whittling away at the big stick to reduce it to something medium-sized? Something that might have looked brutal at any other time, but that's designed to look more like conventional warfare when sized up against a nation-buster?
Yes, that crunching you hear as the Treasurer walks to the podium on budget night might be him stepping on the litter of broken promises, but you'll remember him as the man who saved you from that nasty independent commission of audit.
That's a cynical view, perhaps, but politics is a game played cynically, and not only by one side. I hope it's a guess that's on the mark.
Much as I might not love it as a tactic, I'll take it over the idea of the commission's recommendations being implemented lock, stock and barrel.
Yes, we need to plan to manage debt, but let's not rewrite the federation and populate it with working (and not working) poor in order to do it.
The Commission of Audit looked at the numbers. The Government needs to look at the nation and plan for all of us.
Nick Earls is a novelist.
and in comments to follow:
...."The National Commission of Audit was announced by the Treasurer, Joe Hockey MP, and the Minister for Finance, Senator Mathias Cormann, on 22 October 2013. The Government appointed Mr Tony Shepherd AO to chair the Commission. The other Commissioners were: Dr Peter Boxall AO, Mr Tony Cole AO, Mr Robert Fisher AM, Amanda Vanstone. The Commission's Secretariat was headed up by Mr Peter Crone.
The Commission called for public submissions on 4 November 2013.
The Commission ceased on 31 March 2014.
Over 250 submissions were received from individuals and organisations on a broad range of issues. You can go to the website of The National Commission of Audit and find a list of Submissions.
It is interesting to see that some of the submissions are "Not for publication" but the rest of the Submissions are available to be perused by the public.
"....Extraordinary isn't it..... I scanned the submission from the Institute of Chartered Accountants - I doubt anyone on the faux CofA would have a clue what they were talking about, i.e. the accountants wasted their time."
on 04-05-2014 04:55 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:This week more than any other really demonstrates that conservative values (whatever they may be) are definitely on the nose with the electorate . it's hard to think of anyone who actually likes the tripe they are proposing (well apart from the rather sad usuals who'd clap anything they did )
i think its going to be a short stay.
agreed, I wonder what the servants of murdoch and the hangers on will come up with as a distraction. There's no Falklands for us?
on 04-05-2014 05:05 PM
One reads '' i voted liberal and regret it'' in the comments section under articles (which can be taken with a grain of salt) but i am now hearing it everywhere from real sources. the swing voters have had enough already.
on 04-05-2014 05:11 PM
That's not something men usually brag about, Lakes. But each to his own, I spose.
on 04-05-2014 05:18 PM
if i were silly enough to vote for them then yes i'd keep quiet and regret privately.
on 04-05-2014 06:07 PM
on 04-05-2014 06:09 PM
on 04-05-2014 06:45 PM
http://theaimn.com/2014/05/04/nobody-got-all-ten-right-you-need-all-need-to-resubmit/
The following exercise was not completed correctly by anyone.
Most of you tried to name all these people which wasn’t what the exercise asked you to do. However, I do commend the person who in answering question ten listed the three remaining people who are prepared to admit it.
The correct answers are below:
on 04-05-2014 07:13 PM
Peter Reith, joined the ranks of internal Coalition critics who think next week’s budget might contain some cuts that go too far.
Reith said a proposed deficit levy on people earning more than $80,000 was a “whopping great big tax” which many Liberal supporters were angry about.
“People are not happy. I mean, they were angry and I’m talking about solid Liberal party people who have supported the party for years,” he told Sky’s Australian Agenda program on Sunday.
if this creature says this, one has to wonder just how bad the situation really is..
on 04-05-2014 07:14 PM
Almost three-quarters (72%) of respondents in the poll, published by News Corp Australia, said a rise in taxation would represent a broken promise by the government. Two-party preferred support for the Coalition has plunged by 5.5 percentage points since the election last September. Support for the Coalition now stands at 48% and that for Labor at 52%.