A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Is this really necessary given that it is a criminal matter?

 

Like how much does a Royal Commission cost? $400million? $600million?

 

And why is it that the Liberal Party are forever making the excuse that the 'public' have concerns and this is the reason they have to do something? ("Senator Brandis confirmed...it would be "irresponsible for the government not to respond in an appropriate way" to public concerns."). What concerns? I think the public is more concerned about the secrecy regarding the governments handling of the asylum seekers yet they don't think THOSE public concerns are important.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/royal-commission-into-union-corruption-confirm...

Message 1 of 176
Latest reply
175 REPLIES 175

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Well they are the party of the 50's after all.
Message 2 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Why don't they do something that benefits our safety.......like truck drivers taking drugs and driving ridiculous hours causing accidents.............

 

Obviously the LNP have plenty of money to waste.

Photobucket
Message 3 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Lol - more Champagne being uncorked in chambers across Australia.  Royal Commissions like this (what a quaint anachronism, "Royal", forever hanging off the coat-tails of Mother England) are the refuge of a government with no direction, no ideas and an ideological desire to screw the working class.

The public should be outraged at this blatant waste of taxpayers money.  It would be better spent aimed at the big end of town, where one shonky boardroom decision would equate to 3000 Norm Gallaghers getting a baksheesh roof for his holiday home.

Get rid of shonks ? Yes.  Wherever they are.

I wonder how much "public concern" came from people like Rinehart ? I suppose she is a taxpayer (just) 

prostate cancer ribbon Pictures, Images and Photos
Message 4 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

it's just another witch hunt designed to destroy our Trade Unions, how about the corruption in the NSW Liberal Govt, they are up to their necks in it..........

below are just a few examples of these weasles

from the SMH and IA

 

 

Kent Johns has been replaced as Sutherland Shire mayor following damaging allegations raised by the Herald concerning special favours awarded to developers with Liberal Party connections.

Councillor Johns decided not to contest the mayoral ballot which was held on Monday night.

He also pulled out of the Liberal Party preselection contest for the state seat of Miranda.

 

On the 14th of June, it was reported that Pearce was giving out jobs to his mates.



Ray Whitten, an ex-vice president of Pearce’s Liberal Party branch and a member of the very small “Friends of Greg Pearce” group, was appointed to be deputy chair of the new Safety, Return to Work and Support board — an $80,000 job. Pearce also elected Mr Whitten to the Workcover Authority of NSW and Motor Accidents Authority boards in 2011.

 

Then there’s Gavin Bell, the CEO of Pearce's old law firm Freehills, who was appointed to the Return to Work Safely board. Pearce appointed his secretary's husband Kim Garling as the WorkCover Independent Review Officer last year — a $300,000 job.

 

Not to mention Geoffrey Levy, also from Freehills, being appointed to run the government's property utilisation task-force. Mr Levy chairs a company called Cromwell Property who won a tender to buy $405 million worth of property he recommended the government should sell. Big bucks, even by Eddie Obeid standards.

What has emerged recently is more shocking than all these events, if that is possible.

 

Pearce’s Deputy Chief of Staff Natalie Ward has been forced to quit her job.

 

The problem with Ward is her husband, David Begg, is a lobbyist with a firm called PremierState.

 

The following is on their website under the title “Our People”:




'PremierState was founded by former NSW Cabinet Minister, Michael Photios and David Begg, Managing Director of David Begg & Associates and a former member of the Liberal Party State Executive. Michael and David are joined by a small team of talented professionals who bring a breadth of knowledge and experience across a range of industries.'

 

PremierState is the lobby firm for insurance giants Suncorp and Allianz.

 

It has been revealed that last year Ward and Begg were guests of Suncorp at the Melbourne Cup. This occurred while Ward’s boss, Greg Pearce, was looking at changes to Compulsory Third Party Insurance.


The reforms to green slip insurance, put forward by Mr Pearce, would save insurance companies millions of dollars. Coincidence I’m sure.

The proposals were designed to limit the medical expenses insurance to which companies are exposed. This means despite an increase in the price of your green slip, your level of coverage would plummet.

As a result of this controversy, the proposed changes have not passed through parliament. The project has been taken from Pearce and given to Andrew Constance.

There was recently a pathetic News Limited article, complete with a posed picture of Ward and Begg, complaining about the roads and politicians.

 

The Daily Telegraph painted them as ordinary citizens who are angry at politicians for the state of the roads. Nowhere in the article did it say Ward was a senior staffer of the finance minister, or that Begg is a political lobbyist who has spent time on the Liberal State Executive.

 

It’s easy to understand why people don’t trust News Limited.

Message 5 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Only people with two eyes don't trust News Ltd.
Message 6 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

And no-one has yet to notice that the allegations (and at this point they are only allegations) came from a report by the ABC. Ahh the irony...

 

What I fail to understand is how they can start a Royal Commission when even the police haven't even scratched the surface of their investgation? What if the allegations aren't 100% true? What is the corruption isn't as wide spread as the ABC believes it to be? 

 

Of course Shortens suggestion is best

Message 7 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

"A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?"

 

Possibly for the same reason we need an "independent investigation" into the conduct of the Australian Navy in light of the recent burnt hands debacle.

Message 8 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?

Agreed Icy.

 

But an investigation is all the union allegations require at this stage. A criminal and industry investigation which is exactly what Shorten is recommending.

 

Suggesting a Royal Commission so prematurely is the equivelent of suggesting that we need a Royal Commission into Navy brutality on the basis of some yet to be investigated allegations.

 

Makes absolutely no sense.

Message 9 of 176
Latest reply

Re: A Royal Commission into Union corruption? Why?


@i-need-a-martini wrote:

Agreed Icy.

 

But an investigation is all the union allegations require at this stage. A criminal and industry investigation which is exactly what Shorten is recommending.

 

Suggesting a Royal Commission so prematurely is the equivelent of suggesting that we need a Royal Commission into Navy brutality on the basis of some yet to be investigated allegations.

 

Makes absolutely no sense.


It makes perfect sense to those on the loony side. It is all about killing off Labor and painting all about Labor as criminal.

Message 10 of 176
Latest reply