15 REPLIES 15

Re: A hmmmm moment.


rubbish.I sucked all my kids dummies.
1 had eczema


1 has asthma


1 has nothing



 


Eeew!  There are 600 different bacteria in the human mouth.


 

Message 11 of 16
Latest reply

Re: A hmmmm moment.


 


Er..... they asked them?


 



 


Who are they? 


The whole article is from an unknown source, as stated on the top of the article.


 


One of my children had eczema, the other asthma... neither ever used a dummy.

Message 12 of 16
Latest reply

Re: A hmmmm moment.

For the new study, researchers recruited pregnant women at one Swedish hospital and followed them and their children for three years.


 


 The 184 infants in the study were particularly allergy-prone because 80 per cent had at least one parent with allergies.


 


When the babies were six-months-old, 65 parents reported 'cleaning' their dummies by sucking on them.


 


The children were tested for allergies at 18-months-old and 46 of them had eczema and ten had asthma symptoms. 


 


The transfer of bacteria in the mouth from parents to babies may help strengthen a child's digestive system which could in turn boost immunity


 


Those whose dummies had been sucked on by their parents were 63 per cent less likely to have eczema and 88 per cent less likely to have asthma, compared to the children of parents who did not use the cleaning technique.


 


By 36-months-old, however, the difference had disappeared for asthma.


 


 


Parental dummy sucking was still tied to a 49 per cent lower chance of a child having eczema, the researchers from Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital in Gothenburg found.


 


This is a simple measure which is really, really nice,' Dr Karmaus said. 'But we need a trial to be really sure that this is protective.'


 


 



Read more: 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2320187/Sucking-babys-dummy-giving-prevents-asthma-eczema-...

Message 13 of 16
Latest reply

Re: A hmmmm moment.

Did the researchers state what kind of births they had?


 

Message 14 of 16
Latest reply

Re: A hmmmm moment.

Both delivery mode -- cesarean or vaginal -- and maternal education were related to the likelihood of a parent sucking on the pacifier, and after adjustment for both variables the relationship with eczema remained significant (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.086 to 0.819).


 


Vaginal delivery and parental pacifier sucking were independently associated with a reduced likelihood of developing eczema, with the prevalence of the condition lowest among infants covered by both characteristics (20%) and highest among those covered by neither (54%).


 


"Thus, vaginal delivery, which is a source for transfer of a complex microbiota from mother to infant and parent and infant sharing of a pacifier might both lead to microbial stimulation, with beneficial effects on allergy development," Hesselmar and colleagues wrote.


 


They acknowledged that the study was limited by the small sample size and by the difficulty of diagnosing asthma in early childhood, and called for replication in larger studies and in older children.


 


http://www.medpagetoday.com/AllergyImmunology/Allergy/38888

Message 15 of 16
Latest reply

Re: A hmmmm moment.

Thanks, Am.


 


I asked because it has long been known that a vaginal delivery greatly reduces the incidence of allergies and infections in very young children.  The baby swallows a lot of muck along the way, which is so important for their immune system.


 


The burgeoning rate of allergies has mirrored exactly the burgeoning rate of C sections in Australia.  I do not think that is a coincidence.


 

Message 16 of 16
Latest reply