on 28-03-2014 09:25 AM
says schools submission.
Illustration: Cathy Wilcox
NSW schools want Aboriginal history to remain a ''crucial feature'' of a national curriculum, putting them at odds with the federal Education Minister Christopher Pyne's push for a greater focus on Western civilisations.
The state's school sectors including the Department of Education, the Association of Independent Schools and the Catholic Education Commission have lodged a highly critical submission to the national curriculum review.
In their joint submission, which also represents the position of the NSW Board of Studies, the school sectors argue that studying Aboriginal history and culture is ''essential for the education of all Australian students''.
''The NSW education community strongly supports Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history and cultures as crucial features in any curriculum that is defined as national or Australian,'' the submission says.
Mr Pyne launched a review of the national curriculum in January to ensure it was ''balanced in its content, free of partisan bias and deals with real-world issues'' amid concerns it was too left-leaning and was failing students.
He appointed two outspoken critics of the curriculum, including former teacher Kevin Donnelly, to review it. Mr Donnelly has warned that education has become too secular and has lurched to the ''cultural left'' and Australia's Judeo-Christian heritage should be better reflected in the curriculum.
''The fact that the national curriculum stipulates that every subject must be interpreted through a prism involving indigenous, Asian and sustainability perspectives needs to be revisited,'' Mr Donnelly said.
But the NSW schools submission warns that an understanding of Asia, as well as sustainability, was vital.
''An understanding of Asia and our relationship to the region as well as issues of sustainability are also strongly supported by stakeholders in NSW as important to subject-specific learning,'' the submission says.
The schools sector also criticises the national curriculum for having ''excessive content'' for some of the key subjects.
''It is possible to reasonably interpret that curriculum documents were designed for more teaching hours in total than was available within the school teaching year,'' the submission says.
Mr Donnelly and the other reviewer, Kenneth Wiltshire, a Queensland academic who has labelled the implementation of the Gonski funding model "a national disgrace", are expected to finish their report by midyear.
on 28-03-2014 09:30 AM
I wish it could be in every school.
My daughter (Year 9) does Indigenous Studies but it is an elective - and its new, my other daughter didnt have it offered - she 19.
My primary aged boys (Year 3) dont get anything.
I wld love it to be in there Australia wide - the truth, just the truth.
on 28-03-2014 09:42 AM
@lobs211 wrote:I wish it could be in every school.
My daughter (Year 9) does Indigenous Studies but it is an elective - and its new, my other daughter didnt have it offered - she 19.
My primary aged boys (Year 3) dont get anything.
I wld love it to be in there Australia wide - the truth, just the truth.
We did some wonderful Indigenous history in school, in primary we did a lot on the dreamtime, which made it interesting and exciting for us. The more serious stuff came in early high school.
on 28-03-2014 10:04 AM
Boris what state are u in? I bet ur not In Victoria? and no way Queensland? SO I reckon NSW?
on 28-03-2014 10:14 AM
Inserting Aboriginal studies into maths?? Even Indidginous leaders said they can't see the logic in that. Another left wing smear campaign.
on 28-03-2014 10:16 AM
Lobs, Yes NSW. My schooling days are a long way behind me though.
28-03-2014 10:19 AM - edited 28-03-2014 10:20 AM
@silverfaun wrote:
Inserting Aboriginal studies into maths?? Even Indidginous leaders said they can't see the logic in that. Another left wing smear campaign.
What on earth are you on about - History is what the article and submission are about. Reading the article is alway's a good idea before posting.
on 28-03-2014 10:22 AM
Lobs, my kids all did a lot about the Dreamtime in Primary, We've still got all the books here. It was also covered as part of their Speech and Drama Curriculum.
We don't have any high school specific subjects and none of mine did SOSE or History equivilents, so unless they did something in English, I don't think much was covered there.
But we are doing HEAPS at uni.
Every semester it is heavily addressed in at least one subject, with Property Law probably being the largest with a whole 1/2 semester devoted to it, and then of course we always return to Mabo(2) in just about every semester of PL
just this week in Aust Public law 3, we covered "Sovereignity, Colonization and Aboriginal Torres Straight Islander peoples"
1) Colonization, sovereignty and the legal status of Australia's First Peoples
2) The impact of Mabo2
3) Bureaucratic power and the opression of indigenous communities
4) The "race power": s51(xxvi) and heaps of cases etc establishing land rights etc
5) Indigenous sovereignty and forms of constitutional recognition.
Plus 3 other weeks coming up, so 1/4 of this course and one of our assignments is on arguments for and against constitutional recognition,
on 28-03-2014 10:29 AM
Diamond - are u NSW too?
Vic are far behind 😞
I thnk QLD even worse...
I and a freind went to my kids school and did Indigenous games - just a fun thing and one of the teachers told me she been there over 20 plus years and it the first time she had seen Indig anything apart from a boomerang thrower LOL - boomerangs werent even used here!
on 28-03-2014 10:38 AM