on โ10-05-2015 10:51 AM
I volunteer at a regional gallery and get to meet some wonderful, weird and wacky people.
But the ones that get up my goat are the ones who say "That looks like something a 5 year old would do." and expect me to agree with them.
And whilst we have a lot of community exhibitions that are amateurish enough (so perhaps the comment may be fair enough), the comment is usually reserved for iconic artists in major travelling exhibitions who are extremely well known.
Does anyone here like abstract art? And if you really hate it, why?
on โ12-05-2015 10:38 AM
Talking about the National Gallery and pushing the boundaries
on โ12-05-2015 10:41 AM - last edited on โ12-05-2015 11:07 AM by luna-2304
@poddster wrote:
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
All of those artists DO need a trained eye to work out what their paintings are about.
So that they too can 'Understand" what the artist had for breakfast the morning of the day it was finished.That bit of information will put a whole new visual concept on the picture and you too will be able to sprout forth with your new found knowledge and be admired ๐
Who said anything about what the artist had for breakfast?
on โ12-05-2015 10:52 AM - last edited on โ12-05-2015 11:08 AM by luna-2304
@gleee58 wrote:
@poddster wrote:
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
All of those artists DO need a trained eye to work out what their paintings are about.
So that they too can 'Understand" what the artist had for breakfast the morning of the day it was finished.That bit of information will put a whole new visual concept on the picture and you too will be able to sprout forth with your new found knowledge and be admired ๐Who said anything about what the artist had for breakfast?
Gleee, maybe so they can say 'thats what my 5 year old had for breakfast'
on โ12-05-2015 11:01 AM
on โ12-05-2015 11:11 AM
@opmania wrote:
I spent 7 years on the phone raising funds for research but that does not make me a scientist
No, but it does make you knowledgeable about fund raising for research.
In regards to your analogy, I havent read anywhere where martini states that volunteering at an art gallery, and giving talks about the work and exhibitions there to visitors, that that makes her an artist.
on โ12-05-2015 11:30 AM
on โ12-05-2015 11:42 AM
But you can not bar ignorant people from visiting the gallery perhaps they will be not quite so ignorant after they leave.
just like a nurse shouldn't tell people
they can't go to hospital if they're going
to criticise her/his job lol
that would be unprofessional.
on โ12-05-2015 11:47 AM
on โ12-05-2015 12:47 PM
I love Blue Poles (or should I say "No. 11, 1952" )
I first saw it in Adelaide way back when and I distinctly remember being in awe of it - the size, the presence of it, the use of paint, the story behind it. I saw it many years later in Canberra and nothing had changed, still awesome.
Of course, there was always the derisive "any five-year-old/chimpanzee/blind person" could do it, to which my usual response was "Well go and do it then"
on โ12-05-2015 01:16 PM
@janeababe wrote:
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
If you go to any gallery and don't do your homework or listen to what is told to you by guides or audios, you may as well go and admire the artwork on the shelves at Ikea.
(not that I have anything against Ikea - I have some pretty pieces that go well against my decor that I don't have to think about too much lol).
God Martini, you are starting to sound like a right snob!
Why? For suggesting that some art is more demanding to understand than pleasing mass produced design, which IKEA sells as a decoration? Maybe you also think person is a snob if they tried to point out that Sheakespear's Macbeth is rather deeper than some TV soapies.
But then we could ask ourselves what is good or better art. For instance I once knew a man who painted technically absolutely amazing paintings of people; they looked alive and you had to look 3x to really believe it is not a photo. The problem was that they did not look much as the person he painted. The hair was right, the colour of eyes, but it just did not get the essence of the person. On the other hand some caricaturists can capture person in few seconds and with only few lines, and if it is somebody we know, we can see the resemblance immediately.
So, some people do not have the imagination to appreciate abstract art , that is OK, but to denigrate those who do like it, and put down the artists is just rude.