Alarmist David Suzuki - a "complete know-nothing"

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

After watching Q & A  with David Suzuki....I am starting to  feel kind of sorry for Alarmists....

David Suzuki also had to admit  he was wrong..lol.

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3841115.htm

"David Suzuki on the very first question is revealed as a complete know-nothing. His questioner tells him that the main climate

data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.

Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science.

His questioner then lists them: UAH, RSS, HadCrut and GISS - four of the most basic measurement systems of global

temperature.

Suzuki asks what they are.

Anyone interested in global warming should know right there that Suzuki has absolutely no understanding of what he is talking

about...

For Example - 

Challenged from the floor by Professor Stewart Franks, Suzuki admits he might have been mistaken in claiming global warming

was causing more cyclones, which he blamed for killing the Great Barrier Reef. He blames some Australian for “suggesting” it to

him. The truth, as I’ve noted before, is easily found on the Bureau of Meteorology website:.."

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/suzuki_revealed_as_comple...

Between Tim Flannery and David Suzuki, it must be very embarrassing time to be an Alarmist......lol.

[poddster]

I might need a mountain of Havanas and a few spare years to indulge.

[lakeland27]

no cigar i'm afraid

[poddster]

Joz I could be persuaded to smoke a Havana and guzzle a bit of Dimple  to celebrate the dismantling of the IPPC 🙂

[poddster]

LL what does the verticle axis scale?

Also what is the reference baseline and how and why was it chosen?

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Just a couple more Graphs - Another from NASA (Godard Institute for Space Studies)

RSS - 

  Clearly, 1998 was particularly hot......Monman might like to contact NASA's Godard Institute for Space Studies and let them know they have got it all wrong......giggle....

Poddster - will this do...

Enjoy!

[monman12]

POD: "By the way that temperature swing exists today -40 to +40 degrees C in at least one, that comes to mind, highly populated place in the world. It happens to be a thriving metropolis. Not my idea of a place to live but it is to many millions of others"

Did we not have this  subject raised a while ago POD, Moscow,  and you had not done any research then (either?) I remember producing the morbidity rates for those temperatures which indicated the opposite of thriving.

Moscow

The highest temperature ever recorded was 38.2 °C 2010

the lowest ever recorded was −42.2 °C  1940.

"that temperature swing exists today -40 to +40 degrees C"   today? or  happened once in 70 years, but the hottest was in 2010,

so perhaps it  means Moscow is red-hot,  due to global warming!

But of course you possibly have another metropolis in mind POD? 

 nɥºɾ

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

---

@poddster wrote:

LL what does the verticle axis scale?

Also what is the reference baseline and how and why was it chosen?

---

why would you ask or care ?  please continue with your delusions. the facts are of no interest to you , only pointscoring. so far, you have scored 0.

---

In other words Poddster.....LL doesn't know.

[poddster]

They woud do for a start 🙂

Can you imagine the trend line from 1998 to the present?

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Haaa..... shhhh....the alarmists will become hysterical.......

Enjoy your cigars!!

[poddster]

Try the morbidity rate for Baghdad John if you are trying to tie morbidity to temperature swing 🙂