on 16-04-2014 07:04 PM
watch out Mr Abbott and co, it's called Karma in the way slipper and co were treated by you when in opposition and there isn't a darn thing you can do about it!
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 16-04-2014 08:45 PM
on 16-04-2014 08:58 PM
Stick to your Castlemaine XXXX.
What is Castlemaine?
on 16-04-2014 09:04 PM
on 16-04-2014 09:31 PM
@freshwaterbeach wrote:
What is Castlemaine?
on 16-04-2014 09:50 PM
Thanks for that, Electric.
I think I will stick to my Cab Sav or Merlot.
on 16-04-2014 09:50 PM
"watch out Mr Abbott and co, it's called Karma in the way slipper and co were treated by you when in opposition and there isn't a darn thing you can do about it!"
Here was I thinking Slipper's legal position was a Federal matter and not State ! However, the Federal Court have said Peter Slipper's trial (apropos Ashby) will go ahead after the ACT Magistrate rejected the bid to have his case thrown out. Oh I forgot to mention that Slipper, is still facing three criminal charges of dishonestly causing a loss to the commonwealth, whilst his defence team attempt to claim parliamentary privilege.
Is that the supposed "Karma" you are clutching at DY?
nɥºɾ
on 16-04-2014 10:24 PM
@monman12 wrote:"watch out Mr Abbott and co, it's called Karma in the way slipper and co were treated by you when in opposition and there isn't a darn thing you can do about it!"
Here was I thinking Slipper's legal position was a Federal matter and not State ! However, the Federal Court have said Peter Slipper's trial (apropos Ashby) will go ahead after the ACT Magistrate rejected the bid to have his case thrown out. Oh I forgot to mention that Slipper, is still facing three criminal charges of dishonestly causing a loss to the commonwealth, whilst his defence team attempt to claim parliamentary privilege.
Is that the supposed "Karma" you are clutching at DY?
nɥºɾ
Come on Monman, Slipper should have been allowed to repay the spend in the same way as every other member is allowed to repay the spend. His spending was a much lower amount than that which was paid back by many of his ex colleagues.
on 17-04-2014 06:23 AM
Not to put a damper on a bottle of 1959 Grange hermitage.....but... IMO
.......... Any wine of a vintage of pre 1970 or so .............. is a taste to DIE for
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesticide_residue
These foods, referred to as the "Dirty Dozen" readily absorb pesticides and retain them, so even if washed, they will still have noticeable levels of residues.
The ability of a fruit or vegetable to retain or repel pesticides is dependent on its outer shell or protective layer. Fruits such as strawberries are more likely to absorb and retain pesticides than pineapples are
1957 - 0-1/4 mile, DDT every 14 days as cover spray, including winter and spring; 1/4-1 mile, DDT every 21 days; DDT under infested trees; review of use of DDT because of harmful side effects
....hic....
on 17-04-2014 06:52 AM
@monman12 wrote:"watch out Mr Abbott and co, it's called Karma in the way slipper and co were treated by you when in opposition and there isn't a darn thing you can do about it!"
Here was I thinking Slipper's legal position was a Federal matter and not State ! However, the Federal Court have said Peter Slipper's trial (apropos Ashby) will go ahead after the ACT Magistrate rejected the bid to have his case thrown out. Oh I forgot to mention that Slipper, is still facing three criminal charges of dishonestly causing a loss to the commonwealth, whilst his defence team attempt to claim parliamentary privilege.
Is that the supposed "Karma" you are clutching at DY?
nɥºɾ
No I was referring to every bit of dirt that the Libs when in opposition exaggerated has set a precedent for it to come back at them to at least the same degree, and even the media are picking up on it!
on 17-04-2014 10:28 AM