on 08-11-2013 11:57 AM
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/razor-taken-to-csiro-20131107-2x4fu.html#poll
Almost a quarter of scientists, researchers and workers at Australia's premier science institution will lose their jobs under the federal government's present public service jobs freeze.
The blanket staff freeze across the public service threatens the jobs of 1400 "non-ongoing" workers at the CSIRO and could paralyse some of the organisation's premier research projects, with a ban on hiring, extending or renewing short-term contracts effective immediately.
The impact of the freeze on the CSIRO follows fears expressed in the scientific community about the Abbott government's failure to nominate a dedicated science minister out of his cabinet or ministerial team. The concerns have been heightened by subsequent decisions, including the closure of the global waming advisory body the Climate Change Commission, and revelations on Thursday that Australia will not be sending its Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, or any ministerial stand-in to international climate change negotiations starting on Monday in Warsaw.
The freeze is part of the Abbott government's plan to cut 12,000 jobs from the public service.
On Friday, the government will also announce the immediate dismantling of a raft of government advisory bodies, expert panels and national steering committees, covering diverse areas including ageing, legal affairs, ethics and animal welfare. Federal cabinet this week signed off on the changes, which will see a dozen "non-statutory" bodies axed altogether, and several more amalgamated with other bodies or absorbed into existing departmental functions.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott repeatedly promised before the election that a Coalition government would dramatically reduce the size of the bureaucracy and would do away with thousands of regulations said to be clogging the economy.
"There are currently more than 50,000 Acts and legislative instruments, many of which are a handbrake on Australia's ability to get things done," Mr Abbott said.
The bodies scrapped are: Australian Animals Welfare Advisory Committee; Commonwealth Firearms Advisory Committee; International Legal Services Advisory Committee; National Inter-country Adoption Advisory Council; National Steering Committee on Corporate Wrongdoing; Antarctic Animal Ethics Committee; Advisory Panel on the Marketing in Australia of Infant Formula; High Speed Rail Advisory Group; Maritime Workforce Development Forum; Advisory Panel on Positive Ageing; Insurance Reform Advisory Group; and the National Housing Supply Council.
At the CSIRO, staff leaders fronted their bosses on Thursday, demanding answers on the fate of the workers on contracts, which can often last up to 24 months.
CSIRO has an unusually high proportion of “non-ongoings” with 990 “term” workers and about 440 casual staff among its 6500 headcount.
"It's going to be a huge problem," said one staff member, who wanted to remain anonymous.
Staff were told last week of the decision, which will hit the organisation's 11 research divisions and 11 national research flagships, as well as critical support for frontline scientists.
In an email to staff, CSIRO chief executive Megan Clarke said: "I announce an immediate recruitment freeze covering the following: External recruitment; and, entering into any new, or extending existing term or contract employment arrangements."
Catriona Jackson, the chief executive of Science and Technology Australia, the peak lobby for the nation's scientists, said she was "concerned that cuts to the public service may fall disproportionately on scientists".
West Australian federal Liberal Dennis Jensen, himself a former research scientist at CSIRO, said the suggestion that the government had an anti-science bias was incorrect.
But he admitted the failure to have a dedicated science minister worried him.
"That does concern me," he said.
"If somebody wanted to raise a concern from one of the Cooperative Research Centres, often a bridge between academia and industry, then who would they write to? Do they write to the education minister or the industry minister, I think that is the major problem, that the focus and drive of a single minister is lost."
Labor's spokesman for the environment, climate change and water, Mark Butler, said he wasn't surprised that scientists were being sacked by the government, say Mr Abbott does not respect scientists' work, particulary on climate change.
''And I don't think it's a coincidence that the experts being sacked by this government have previously pointed out the serious flaws in the Coalition's direct action con,'' Mr Butler said.
on 08-11-2013 06:41 PM
I think you have to have a Uni score of 99.9/100 (NSW)to be eligible to study medicine (this % could change a little every year). How many students in their final year of school acheive that? Not a lot.
Does Australia have enough intelligent people to qualify to become Doctors, Medical Specialists?
on 08-11-2013 07:20 PM
The previous government had a mammalogist/palaeontologist, as their "expert" advisor on 'Global Warming" where is the sense in that?
on 08-11-2013 07:20 PM
@poddster wrote:Narrow ideaology ????
By that are you saying that socialism is the answer? Look around you LL, is socialism working anywhere?
Are you in favour of a thousand committees funded by the public purse sitting around generating hot air?
Denmark
Finland
The Netherlands
Sweden
Norway
Do you wan't me to keep going?
Or will you eat the humble pie?
on 08-11-2013 07:26 PM
The current Prime Minister and a recent previous were born overseas ( to UK parents)... shouldn't there be Australian born people suitable for this job?
on 08-11-2013 07:33 PM
Apparently not, an excess of beer and football addles the brain it seems
on 08-11-2013 07:34 PM
@am*3 wrote:The current Prime Minister and a recent previous were born overseas ( to UK parents)... shouldn't there be Australian born people suitable for this job?
No, both these people are the best we could come up with.........the clever country as you may recall....
on 08-11-2013 07:47 PM
@am*3 wrote:Lets be realistic a person who has studied and is employed in engineering and related fields and gets made redundant - they are hardly like to swing to a medical profession.. completely different fields... plus the expense of more studying ( $60-$100 000 in Uni fees) and the lack of full time income while studying
After studying medicine, anaesthetists usually complete an intern year, one to two years as a general hospital resident and then at least five years of specialist training thereafter.
That is a lot of years from studying to qualifying.. hardly something an unemployed 40+yo aircraft engineer/mechanic is likely to undertake.. probably wouldn't get accepted for the course to start with.
Have either of these two fields been made redundant? I thought both of these featured heavily on the list of required skills. (Engineering and Anaesthesiology) Even if they were, there are plenty of alternative specialties in their relevant fields that do feature on that list and would not require complete retraining or entrance into a different field.
As for the expense, most of those over 45 received their university degree for free as it was indeed free between 1974 and 1988. Prior to 1974 the fees were tempered by Commonwealth and state scholarships and since 1989 by an income contingent loan scheme. So the government has either subsidised or paid for their education, and that government now, as has every preceding government, requires them to either perform, retrain or get out. not every gravy train lasts forever.
There are plenty of other fields in demand which would require at most, a Graduate Diploma (One year) in which to retrain. If those ensconsed in these high paying professions have not managed to save sufficiently to support what equates to a further 26 weeks of study with access to Government support and supplements then there is also the option of becoming a Baker or Pastry Cook, both of which are on that list and both of which garner a full time wage and additional supplements throughout training and qualification.
on 08-11-2013 08:10 PM
@am*3 wrote:I think you have to have a Uni score of 99.9/100 (NSW)to be eligible to study medicine (this % could change a little every year). How many students in their final year of school acheive that? Not a lot.
Does Australia have enough intelligent people to qualify to become Doctors, Medical Specialists?
Well, we don't want everybody to enter the medical field or there will soon be an over supply of skilled people in that area. There are many, many more occupations available both within the field and out (including lecturing at university, teaching, childcare) many of which do not require a very high score at all. Plus, those who already hold tertiaty qualifications are not assessed in the same way as a person entering anew as their prior learning is also considered.
These were the requirements for entry into UNSW in 2013. It is quite different and far more optimistic than your assumption/prediction. Of course, these scores are only for Undergraduates and are not relevant in the same way to those who can demondstrate any prior learning including other tertiary qualifications, Trades or TAFE courses etc.
New South Wales | ATAR of 96.00 |
Victoria | ENTER of 96.00 |
Queensland | OP3 |
South Australia, Western Australia & Tasmania | TER of 96.00 |
International Baccalaureate | 37 |
on 08-11-2013 08:11 PM
Aircraft engineers at Qantas plant Geelong, made redundant... nearly 300 laid off, not likely many will get work in that field in Australia.. should they retrain as medical specialists or dentists because Australia has a shortage of them?
on 08-11-2013 08:21 PM
Job loss is not isolated to any one country, government or industry. Job loss is an inevitable consequence of technological advancement and the subsequent shift in demand that it creates. As our wants and needs and the associated quantities that we require of these, change and evolve, so too must our skills and knowledge in order to both facilitate and accommodate a desirable and necessary equilibrium. Failure to do so will result in an unsustainable future for ALL Australians and severely impact on our ability for inclusion and performance in a global environment. Taking into consideration the rate at which technology is currently advancing and the speed at which new information is developed, It is estimated that many of the Graduates of 2013 will need to retrain up to 6 times before they retire.