Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

[donnashuggy]

and why?

[debra9275]

us

[debra9275]

I think that with the appointment of the new premier in NSW, after watching the 7.30 report, that it's more likely the Libs will be

as he just demonstrated that they give jobs to the boys whether they're suitable candidates or not

[poddster]

Oh yes the undefined collective 'Us". They are everywhere but incognito 🙂

[debra9275]

yes, they are 

[poddster]

Are they complete with undefined, incognito standards?

[debra9275]

who the libs??

possibly

[poddster]

Tsk Tsk Deb, the "we" "us" and collectively "they" were the ones under discussion 🙂 Have you forgotten already?:)

[debra9275]

no I'm just sticking to the topic

[just_me_karen]

The new breed of Libs are definitely more corrupt. They have an attitude of entitlement and everything is about money.

REAL Libs are less corrupt. I mean traditional Libs, not like the ones we see here. Fraser is an example..lithe old fashioned, traditionally in business or professions, self reliant. Those Libs are well educated and protective of their ethics. Sadly, there's not many of them about these days.

The new age Libs are the truly dirty ones. They succeed via nepotism, dirty deals, underhand tactics and intimidation. There are two types...the business people and the wannabes. We don't see any of the business type here on CS.

The other type are the uneducated, xenophobic, anti change, anti science, anti new millennium, dishonest and dodgy 😄

[boris1gary]

---

@debra9275 wrote:

no I'm just sticking to the topic

---

Well on the Federal level, since 1901 - 18 conservatives and 10 from the Labor Party resigned or were sacked for an assortment of corrupt behaviours, the worst period for the cons being the howard years.