on 16-02-2013 01:27 PM
for science? cosmetics or others?
Do you differentiate between what animal being tested is acceptable to you?
on 17-02-2013 02:16 AM
there are certainly some excellent cosmetic companies that don't test on animals.
i do not believe in using animals for testing. i certainly don't believe in breeding animals for testing, that is barbaric. it is disappointing how many companies do test on animals and also that some have gone back to it to sell in the Chinese market.
on 17-02-2013 02:37 AM
"Humans have no more rights than another being/animal/insect."
fair dinkum, some folks are ... well, you know B-) :^O
I'm gonna agree with Eloi on this one. It's pretty obvious we value our species more than others.
on 17-02-2013 02:44 AM
So, do you also believe in Capital Punishment?
I can sense the same sort of arguments being presented....
Believe it or not, I actually don't have an opinion of Capital Punishment. I can argue both sides just as well.
I But yes I value their life less. And I wouldn't hesitate to use them for organ donation either.
on 17-02-2013 08:29 AM
Here are some benefits
antibiotics
vaccines
insulins
pharmaceuticals to treat high blood pressure, epilepsy,ulcers, cancer and mental illness
anaesthetics
Veterinary medicine (all veterinary treatments, prophylactic measures and diagnostic techniques have to be tested in animals)
http://animalresearch.info/en/medical-advances/128/animal-research-and-medical-progress/
I can be against because I have and would use these things.
I also eat meat and wear leather so I'd be a hypocrite if I said that I thought animals were equal.
on 17-02-2013 08:32 AM
animal meat that is...not human
on 17-02-2013 08:36 AM
I can be against should be I can't be against
on 04-03-2013 10:12 AM
on 04-03-2013 10:20 AM
I don't like it but....these men did worse, yet we benefited from it?
Dr. Eduard Wirths
Dr. Josef Mangele
on 04-03-2013 10:42 AM