Azita Bokan witnessed violent assaults on Manus Island

[donnashuggy]

Lost her job?

http://www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2014/02/21/3949893.htm?site=sydney&program=702_drive

[windrake]

Machete Morrison, worm, swamp dweller, filthy racist. These are just a tiny bit of the descriptive words uttered on here.

One wonders that  this type of language is allowed on here from any who care to utter it.

I feel the boards have gone downhill since Labor was defeated, the hate & vitriol everyday is appalling. Now I expect to hear howls of protest but look at the way this is going on now, the offensive  hate has ruined any decent person from participating.

Try to lift yourselves up please, try to have a decent debate and leave the appalling name calling out, after all we are adults aren't we? we are not in the playground.

[boris1gary]

---

@languidlady49 wrote:

This is my comprehension of this thread and please feel free to correct me as I'm sure you will. Despite being told by Mr Rudd (ALP) that arrivals after a certain date will not under any circumstances be allowed to settle in Australia but will be taken to Manus island and relocated eventually into New Guinea, some people managed to find a large amount of money (lucky them) and managed to get here anyway when as they had been informed previously they were sent to Manus Island. They then rioted and destroyed things when the facts sunk home accelerating the obvious consequences.

So instead of being outraged and "empathatic and understanding" about Africans starving for double digit years in camps patiently waiting for a place or the lack of funding for Aboriginals, mentally handicapped, old age pensioners and diggers etc. you prefer to take the side of opportunists.

Do me a favour!

---

opportunists, you mean the Prime Minister for Unemployment  - i only see a few taking their side. Where is the thread from concerns re: lack of funding for Aboriginals, mentally handicapped, old age pensioners and diggers etc - my last topic was hijacked by "drinkers" so maybe someone else could have a go..............waiting.

[boris1gary]

---

@poddster wrote:

The shrill cacophonous mob will screech on any issue that that involves the government. Most of them still have not accepted the fact that election is over and the vast majority have chosen.

---

yes that shrill cacophonous mob do still screech and blame the previous government for all and sundry, talk about not taking responsibility - it's kevins fault, its julias fault, nothing is the current governments fault.

[lakeland27]

i thought it was rudds worst idea, and the LNP mob embraced it . possibly because it was a bad idea, they seem to keep the worst and dump the best. klutzes the lot of em'

[monman12]

"The gruesome murder of a man in our care?"  I suspect INAM that you,  whilst using the term "murder" incorrectly , do it deliberately, why?

Perhaps it might be as POD has wisely written: "And of course the rulings will be disputed by the armchair judges according to their political leanings "

nɥºɾ

[spotweldersfriend]

Put him in a chaff bag 🙂

[lakeland27]

---

@monman12 wrote:

"The gruesome murder of a man in our care?"  I suspect INAM that you,  whilst using the term "murder" incorrectly , do it deliberately, why?

Perhaps it might be as POD has wisely written: "And of course the rulings will be disputed by the armchair judges according to their political leanings "

nɥºɾ

---

its new-found wisdom if at all. more like a convenient stance.

[lakeland27]

---

@monman12 wrote:

"The gruesome murder of a man in our care?"  I suspect INAM that you,  whilst using the term "murder" incorrectly , do it deliberately, why?

Perhaps it might be as POD has wisely written: "And of course the rulings will be disputed by the armchair judges according to their political leanings "

nɥºɾ

---

the other thing you fail to grasp is that INAM is turning Bolt and Akerman back on their readers , after years of the same from them.

slack contractors make rudd a murderer somehow so fairs fair ..

[i-need-a-martini]

---

@monman12 wrote:

"The gruesome murder of a man in our care?"  I suspect INAM that you,  whilst using the term "murder" incorrectly , do it deliberately, why?

Perhaps it might be as POD has wisely written: "And of course the rulings will be disputed by the armchair judges according to their political leanings "

nɥºɾ

---

I already responded to this monman.

Yes 'murder' is the term I have been using.

The young man did not die of natural causes. He did not die in an accident. He was deliberately and unlawfully killed. That's murder as far as I am concerned. 

As I said before, how else would you like it described? "Passed over".?

[i-need-a-martini · Accepted solution]

And yes monman I say the word deliberately. And why wouldn't I?

We call it murder when a drunken lout pushes a kid over and he hits his head on the footpath on George street and subsequently dies. We can spend weeks showing the face and the facebook messages of this 'murderer' who probably had no idea what he was doing at the time. We can change laws to make sure that something that would have been regarded as an accidental death or mansalughter cops the full brunt of the law and has the perpetrator put away for murder.

If we call that murder, then this sits firmly in the same category.