Baby #3 for Cambridges

 Kensington Palace announces third royal baby on the way

 

 

 

THE Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting a third child who will be fifth in line to the British throne.

 

Kensington Palace announced the news on Monday, saying that the Queen and rest of the Royal Family are delighted.

 

The Duchess is suffering from an extreme form of morning sickness, as she did with previous pregnancies.

 

She has been forced to cancel her planned engagement at a London children"s hospital today and is being cared for at Kensington Palace.

 

 

 

Message 1 of 30
Latest reply
29 REPLIES 29

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

funny that, sounds like what i was getting told before i had me holiday.

 

i cant control what people think.

 

i can also not change my sense of humour, it is what it is.

Message 11 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

de2541604fa3b85f78e9da879d0d4c17.jpg

Message 12 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges


@lyndal1838 wrote:

@lind9650 wrote:

@davidc4430 wrote:

Oh dear, was it planned?

i guess dad will need a second job to cover the bills.

maybe night security at bucks palace? i believe hes in with the owners so that might help.

will have to boot that no hoper brother outta the spare room, gonna need the extra space.


Why so sarcastic, David?

The brother has served two stints in Afghanistan and taken over a lot of his late mothers charity work. I would not call him a no hoper.

 

Erica


Tongue in cheek or not, this is very much David's posting style these days.

It is unfortunate that he only seems to make negative comments about any stories he posts.


...........ahhh, Lyn, but it was Icy who posted it..... funny that! Man LOL  Man LOL  Man LOL

 

 

********* *********** *********** ************ ************ *********** ***********
Be Kind To Nurses....
They Stop The Doctors From Killing You.
Message 13 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

True, but Icy did not make any negative comments about the story....David chose to do so.

Message 14 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

Royal or commoner, who doesn't love a new baby?

 

I do feel sorry for her she's going through that morning sickness again like when she was carrying George. Maybe it'll be another boy?

 

Now it'll be on with guessing what the new bub's name will be.

Message 15 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges


@davidc4430 wrote:

funny that, sounds like what i was getting told before i had me holiday.

 

i cant control what people think.

 

i can also not change my sense of humour, it is what it is.


No one is forced to read your posts but they cannot seem to help themselves  lol   

Message 16 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

For what its worth i'm neither for or against the british royal family.

 

it sadens me to think how much money they cost when their are so many poor in britain.

 

i also dont believe they have a role here in australia besides being a novelty of a bygone era.

 

they do seem to be loved by a lot of people.

Message 17 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges

It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

 

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

 

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be   ..... 

Message 18 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges


@bushies.girl wrote:

It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

 

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

 

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be   ..... 


Oh well, he was born into money and she married into it.  It's the way things go.

 

I've never seen babies as particularly special, but then I don't have a maternal bone in my body.  I'm always interested in what names kids end up with these days though...but then again I'd ask the same question about any pets a family might have. 😉

 

I'm more don't mess with the status quo if it aint broke, than an actual royalist.  They can't be worse than the ineffectual weasels we've got in our current government and opposition, none of which IMO deserve to be in charge of an Oz republic.

Message 19 of 30
Latest reply

Re: Baby #3 for Cambridges


@zanadoo_56 wrote:

@bushies.girl wrote:

It saddens me thta thye have so much, when others have so little 😞

 

Women fall pregnant/give birth every minute of every day, so dunno what makes this baby any more special than any other baby.

 

I am anti royals, always have been, always will be   ..... 


Oh well, he was born into money and she married into it.  It's the way things go.

 

I've never seen babies as particularly special, but then I don't have a maternal bone in my body.  I'm always interested in what names kids end up with these days though...but then again I'd ask the same question about any pets a family might have. 😉

 

I'm more don't mess with the status quo if it aint broke, than an actual royalist.  They can't be worse than the ineffectual weasels we've got in our current government and opposition, none of which IMO deserve to be in charge of an Oz republic.


Loving your honesty... 😉  

 

Message 20 of 30
Latest reply