Ban the Bomb?

'I can't live in the wreckage': Victorian road toll sparks safety summit as mum pushes for action

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-31/victoria-road-safety-summit-to-address-growing-road-toll/1115...

 

sure, ban low priced cars but the cars arnt killing people its the nuts holding the steering wheels that getting people killed.

if you drive any car badly there is a good chance you will crash into something.

 

its that connection between the brain and the right foot that needs control.

 

sadly no one can control the driving but the driver.

Message 1 of 10
Latest reply
9 REPLIES 9

Ban the Bomb?

While not wanting to appear to be completely heartless, have a close read:

 

"They were passengers in a vehicle being driven by Wendy's boyfriend Matthew, who also died when he hit an oncoming car while overtaking."

 

"Ten years later, her son Grant was severely injured in a crash which killed the driver, his best mate... he blamed himself for not being sober and telling Marcus to slow down,"

 

"Twelve years later, she received an unthinkable phone call. Another of her daughters, Nicole, had been in a crash.

Her boyfriend, who was driving, clipped a sign at a roundabout and Nicole wasn't wearing a seat belt."

Seriously - not one of those was the fault of the vehicle. Not one. Claiming that the vehicles were unsafe doesn't cut it - in each case, the drivers were unsafe. The girl not wearing a seat-belt - again, hardly the car's fault.

 

Five-star safety vehicle ratings shouldn't be a means of compensating for one-star drivers.

 

 

Message 2 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

go-tazz
Community Member

Like many young Australians, TAC chief executive Joe Calafiore's first car was a hand-me-down from his parents.

 

But with young people over-represented in road trauma statistics, it's a practice he wants parents to reconsider.

"We really urge parents to think about that very deeply," he says.

A new car obviously costs more money. But to Joe, safety is not just for the very wealthy.

There are five-star safety-rated cars on sale for under $20,000.

 

What planet does he live on trying to blame parents for their kids driving skills.shok.gif

 

It's hard enough or impossible for most  families to come up with that for one child but if they have 2 or 3 kids it

 

means $40 to $60 thousand dollars for cars (he would earn enough to do it but a large percentage of parents

 

can't).

 

Unrealistic statements like that doesn't help in any way at all.Angry head bang.gif

Message 3 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

We purchased an older car for our son that was one of the highest safety rated in its day. It cost $5,500 and has been 100% reliable for the past two years.

 

The daughter has just got her "P"s and we found her a two year old smaller car for sale on the side of the road, 40,000 km. with 5 star ANCAP safety rating. That one cost us $8000. Absolutely fastidious elderly owners who even kept all of their fuel reciepts and stuck them into a book. The only downside was it was a manual, so the daughter had to learn to drive a stick shift. It took a few months, but now she loves the manual and says she wouldnt dream of going back to an auto.

 

So it is possible to get the kids into safe cars at a reasonably affordable price.

Message 4 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

martinw-48
Community Member
Reality is that new drivers need to be taught how to drive.
Nowadays it's just about passing the driving test.
I believe parents should have to pass a test to be able to teach their kids to drive.
Recently had a black Range Rover blast past me at an unsafe place to pass at more than 120 k with L plates on it.
Hardly being taught responsible vehicle use there
Message 5 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?


@performance_parts_clearance_centre wrote:

 

Five-star safety vehicle ratings shouldn't be a means of compensating for one-star drivers.

 


Agree, the responsiblity lies with the driver.

No matter how much education or training is provided, idiots will still exist, and 5 star rated vehicles wont stop it.

 

https://au.news.yahoo.com/man-nabbed-going-185km-h-kids-car-221921311--spt.html

 

allegedly with 6 kids and a woman in the vehicle, and drugs in his system.

 

 

Message 6 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

One of the most urgent changes that need to be made is retirees towing caravans. Currently you have office workers who's only driving experience is commuting to work in the city in the 4 cylinder family car, retiring and buying the big 4wd and hooking the 9 metre by 2.2 metre home away from home on the back and then driving around Australia. Some of these things are as big as a semi trailer, but you can drive them on a standard car licence.

 

They drive at 70 km. per hour on the open road with long lines of cars behind and often cant even back them in to the parking space at tourist parks. ( according to my cousin who lives in a mobile caravan, travels around Australia and regularly gets asked to park other peoples vans. ) Its crazy stuff.

 

I had cause to tow a reasonably large van for someone else the other day. I have a semi licence and have driven a lot of trucks, but still found this thing a handful.

 

When the towing rules where enacted people had an old Holden and towed a single axle van to the coast for the holidays. The law makers did not envisage the monsters to come. People should be allowed to tow a certain sized van without a whole lot of red tape, but once they are longer than say 4 metres, they should sit a driving test similar to what small truck drivers do. If they are competent it wont be a problem. The only ones who will squeal are the old nongs with poor driving skills who should not be towing the things in the first place. Oh and maybe the large industry that is built around this stupidity !

Message 7 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

south australia has far too many long haul roads whith no 'over taking' lanes installed.

the road from port wakefield to wallaroo is tipical.

one long bendy road with ups n downs so you cannot safely pass a slower vehicle.

so you get one person sitting on 85kph and everyone else is forced to do the same or take a risk.

 

we need more 'over taking lanes' IMO

Message 8 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

Unfortunately SA doesn't get enough revenue from rego's,etc to fund a better road system as the state is to

 

large for them to be maintained and improved to a better standard with not enough finance to do it.

 

The road from Terowie to Pt Pirie is one you don't want to travel to often either as it's bendy and hilly and so is

 

travelling from Gawler through Murray Bridge to Mt Gambier and then Portland in Victoria.

 

Even Victoria which does get good revenue doesn't spend it on a number of country roads but instead

 

concentrates it on the more populated cities and country roads can suffer (some of our country roads also have

 

long stretches of highway with no overtaking lanes and are in poor condition).

 

Then when people have crashes on country roads they blame everything else but not the roads.stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif 

Message 9 of 10
Latest reply

Ban the Bomb?

Rising road toll has concerned SA police chief seeking answers from interstate

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-04/spike-road-tolls-nationwide-prompts-police-discussion/1117662...

 

well come on, how many are caught driving a second time or third or name a number after the first time losing their liscence ect?

give people 1 chance, then jail them.

 

sorry but the 'you broke the law pay a fine' isnt working.

no good removing a driving lisence if they still drive without real consequences.

and how often do i rewad some scumbags been involved in a crash, drunk and they have a record of multiple drink drive failures?

 

i dont want to see our police chief crying crocodile tears about the road toll, i wanna see repeat offenders in jail

i dont drink drive

i dont use a mobile phone when driving

i try really hard to never speed

 

i expect everyone else to be doing the same

Message 10 of 10
Latest reply