Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

Message 1 of 39
Latest reply
38 REPLIES 38

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled



 


Signatures suck.
Message 31 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled


The aliens have far superior technology to us. For example they use ports to move from a to b. The ability of making themselves invisible.


 


 


 


Bah humbug.. old hat.......I use the same techniques myself


 


.. I find it much easier to pack my things in garbage bags or boxes if I am moving from A to B but if I have a port..then I will use it.....


 


as for invisibility I recently discovered by accident that I have that ability as well ..... I stood at a bar for 45 minutes trying to get a drink and it wasn't until I superglued a $50 "tip" to my forehead that I appeared visible to the barmaid...

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 32 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

To study the specimen, Nolan sought clues in Ata's genome. He initially presumed the specimen was tens or hundreds of thousands of years old - the Atacama Desert may be the driest spot on the planet, so Ata could have been preserved for aeons. He consulted experts who had extracted DNA from bones of the Denisovans, an Asian relative of European Stone Age Neandertals. It turned out that their protocols weren't necessary. "The DNA was modern, abundant, and high quality," he says, indicating that the specimen is probably a few decades old.


To the chagrin of UFO hunters, Ata is decidedly of this world. After mapping more than 500 million reads to a reference human genome, equating to 17.7-fold coverage of the genome, Nolan concluded that Ata "is human, there's no doubt about it". Moreover, the specimen's B2 haplotype-a category of mitochondrial DNA - reveals that its mother was from the west coast of South America: Chile, that is.


The miniature skeleton has 10 ribs instead of the usual 12.


Meanwhile, after examining X-rays, Lachman concluded that Ata's skeletal development, based on the density of the epiphyseal plates of the knees (growth plates at the end of long bones found only in children), surprisingly appears to be equivalent to that of a six- to eight-year-old child. If that holds up, there are two possibilities, Nolan says. One, a long shot, is that Ata had a severe form of dwarfism, was actually born as a tiny human, and lived until that calendar age. To test that hypothesis, he will try to extract haemoglobin from the specimen's bone marrow and compare the relative amounts of foetal versus adult haemoglobin proteins. The second possibility is that Ata, the size of a 22-week-old foetus, suffered from a severe form of a rare rapid ageing disease, progeria, and died in the womb or after premature birth.


Nolan hasn't yet turned up hits for genes known to be associated with progeria or dwarfism. He's stepping up the search for mutations through additional sequencing and casting a wider net. Another possibility is a teratogen: a birth defect-inducing toxicant along the lines of thalidomide. Nolan plans to analyse tissue using mass spectrometry to look for toxicants or metabolites. But reports of a handful of other Tom Thumb-sized skeletons from Russia and elsewhere have Nolan leaning toward a genetic explanation.


At least one expert has a more prosaic take-but agrees that the specimen is human. "This looks to me like a badly desiccated and mummified human foetus or premature stillbirth," says William Jungers, a palaeoanthropologist and anatomist at Stony Brook University Medical Centre in New York. He notes that "barely ossified and immature elements" of the hands and feet, and the wide open metopic suture, where the two frontal bones of the skull come together down the middle of the forehead. "Genetic anomalies are not evident, probably because there aren't any," he says. Nolan responds that the rib number and epiphyseal plate densities remain a riddle; while he is open to the foetus hypothesis, he thinks that the jury is still out.


Nolan's analysis went viral this week; besieged as he has been by the media circus, he doesn't regret having gotten involved in debunking a claim of alien life. "I'm thrilled with the outcome," he says. Once the analyses are complete, he says, he'll submit his findings for peer review. The other claim Nolan debunks is that Ata is an elaborate hoax. The X-rays clearly show these are real bones, complete with arterial shadows, he says. "You just couldn't fake it," he says, adding, with a laugh, "unless you were an alien."


 




Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/bizarre-skeleton-leaves-ufo-hunters-and-scientists-baffled...


Message 33 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

am i supposed to read all that^?


 


 


 


colic, them werent my words, its a quote from the OP


Signatures suck.
Message 34 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

hi Joe----buried your bone lately?-just asking.................Richo.

Message 35 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

:^O @ colic

Message 36 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

now Rich,that could be taken another way ๐Ÿ˜ฎ :^O

Message 37 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

G'day Richo, Gentlemen don't tell, lol


Signatures suck.
Message 38 of 39
Latest reply

Re: Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

Laughing at the two lone rangers :^O

.
Message 39 of 39
Latest reply